Literature DB >> 32773824

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Pharmacist Interprofessional Competencies Tool.

Lisa A Salvati1, Lisa M Meny1, Margaret C de Voest1, David R Bright1, Kari L Vavra-Janes1, Mark A Young1, Shelby E Kelsh1, Michelle J Sahr1, Greg S Wellman1.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine the validity and reliability of the Pharmacist Interprofessional Competencies Tool (PICT). Methods. Faculty members at Ferris State University, College of Pharmacy developed the PICT, which has five interprofessional criterion (collaboration, ownership, respect, engagement, and application) and four competency levels (unacceptable, novice, competent, and proficient) to assess the interprofessional competencies of pharmacy students. Fourteen pharmacy faculty members were trained in how to use the PICT and then used it to assess students' behaviors in four to six video-recorded interprofessional education (IPE) learning activities. A subset of these faculty members evaluated the video-recorded IPE learning activities using two other previously validated interprofessional assessment tools. Psychometric analysis of the PICT, including internal consistency and inter-rater reliability, was conducted, along with a correlation analysis and factor analysis, and the results were compared to those from the other validated assessment tools. Results. The overall rating of the internal consistency of the PICT was excellent and item-total correlations of the individual criterion were fair to good, with the exception of the respect criterion. The PICT demonstrated excellent overall inter-rater reliability, and individual criterion rated as fair to excellent with the exception of the respect criterion. Specific dimensions of the PICT showed high convergence with previously validated interprofessional assessment tools. Conclusion. The PICT exhibited overall validity and reliability as an assessment tool for measuring the interprofessional competencies of pharmacy students. In establishing the overall validity and reliability of the assessment tool, the respect criterion was not proved to be reliable or valid. Additional training and slight modifications to the PICT and associated IPE learning activities are planned to assist with longitudinal assessment of student performance across the curriculum.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; assessment tool; interprofessional education; reliability; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32773824      PMCID: PMC7405300          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  12 in total

1.  Measures of interprofessional education and collaboration.

Authors:  Jennifer Thannhauser; Shelly Russell-Mayhew; Catherine Scott
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.338

2.  An Interprofessional Education Panel on Development, Implementation, and Assessment Strategies.

Authors:  Abby A Kahaleh; Jennifer Danielson; Kari L Franson; Wesley A Nuffer; Elena M Umland
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Development and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR).

Authors:  Vernon Curran; Ann Hollett; Lynn M Casimiro; Patricia Mccarthy; Valerie Banfield; Pippa Hall; Kelly Lackie; Ivy Oandasan; Brian Simmons; Susan Wagner
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.338

Review 4.  A critical appraisal of instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education.

Authors:  Matthew Oates; Megan Davidson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes.

Authors:  Gary D Rogers; Jill E Thistlethwaite; Elizabeth S Anderson; Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren; Ruby E Grymonpre; Monica Moran; Dujeepa D Samarasekera
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  What we measure … and what we should measure in medical education.

Authors:  John R Boulet; Steven J Durning
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  The intersection of professionalism and interprofessional care: development and initial testing of the interprofessional professionalism assessment (IPA).

Authors:  Jody S Frost; Dana P Hammer; Loretta M Nunez; Jennifer L Adams; Benjamin Chesluk; Catherine Grus; Neil Harvison; Kathy McGuinn; Luke Mortensen; John H Nishimoto; Anthony Palatta; Margaret Richmond; Elisabeth J Ross; John Tegzes; Alexis L Ruffin; John P Bentley
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.338

8.  Introducing the individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool (iTOFT): Development and description of a new interprofessional teamwork measure.

Authors:  Jill Thistlethwaite; Kathy Dallest; Monica Moran; Roger Dunston; Chris Roberts; Diann Eley; Fiona Bogossian; Dawn Forman; Lesley Bainbridge; Donna Drynan; Sue Fyfe
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.338

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools Measuring Interprofessional Education Outcomes Relevant to Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Sarah Shrader; Michelle Z Farland; Jennifer Danielson; Brigitte Sicat; Elena M Umland
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  When less is more: validating a brief scale to rate interprofessional team competencies.

Authors:  Désirée A Lie; Regina Richter-Lagha; Christopher P Forest; Anne Walsh; Kevin Lohenry
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.