Literature DB >> 34007716

Team-Based Decision-Making in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Are Pre-Licensure Healthcare Students "Collaborative Practice-Ready"?

Renee Dagenais1, Shane Ashley Pawluk2, Daniel Rainkie2, Kyle John Wilby3.   

Abstract

Evaluation of pre-licensure students' competency in team-based decision-making is lacking. The purposes of this study were to evaluate pre-licensure pharmacy students' competency in team-based decision-making in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and to determine whether performance correlated with reflective assignment scores. Students' self-assessment and conceptualization of team-based decision-making in practice was also evaluated. Twenty-three pre-licensure pharmacy students' competency in team-based decision-making was evaluated in an OSCE station and with a reflective journal assignment; rubric scores for both evaluations were compared using Spearman's rank order analysis. Students completed an 18-item questionnaire regarding attitudes, confidence, and perceptions related to team-based decision-making. Descriptive statistics and construct analysis with open coding were used to analyse questionnaire results. Mean OSCE station and reflective journal scores were 45% and 66.3%, respectively, and were not correlated. Students' attitudes toward team-based decision-making were positive, and they reported performing associated behaviours during experiential education rotations. Students appropriately defined 'team-based decision-making' and were highly confident in performing related activities. However, students' conceptualization of team-based decision-making did not align with the pharmacy program's competency framework. Three key themes were identified through the study analyses: 1) student performance is dependent on assessment context when evaluating collaborator-related competencies; 2) there is a mismatch between students' perceived competency and objectively measured competence when collaborator outcomes were assessed within an OSCE; and 3) students' perceptions of team-based decision-making do not align with the program's competency framework. Future research is necessary to assess competency and perceptions of team-based decision-making in students from other healthcare professions, and to further evaluate whether pre-licensure students are "collaborative practice ready". © University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing.

Keywords:  Assessment; Collaboration; Curriculum; Evaluation; Pharmacy Education

Year:  2018        PMID: 34007716      PMCID: PMC6302759          DOI: 10.24926/iip.v9i3.1255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Pharm        ISSN: 2155-0417


  19 in total

1.  Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: reforming health care by transforming health professionals' education.

Authors:  Madeline Schmitt; Amy Blue; Carol A Aschenbrener; Thomas R Viggiano
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Assessing 3rd year medical students' interprofessional collaborative practice behaviors during a standardized patient encounter: A multi-institutional, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sandra K Oza; Christy K Boscardin; Maria Wamsley; Aimee Sznewajs; Win May; Andrew Nevins; Malathi Srinivasan; Karen E Hauer
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Assessment and evaluation in interprofessional education: exploring the field.

Authors:  Amy V Blue; Benjamin J Chesluk; Lisa N Conforti; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2015

Review 4.  An exploratory review of pre-qualification interprofessional education evaluations.

Authors:  Jill Thistlethwaite; Koshila Kumar; Monica Moran; Rosemary Saunders; Sandra Carr
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.338

5.  Assessing interprofessional competence using a prospective reflective portfolio.

Authors:  Sezer Domac; Liz Anderson; Michelle O'Reilly; Roger Smith
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.338

6.  Interprofessional education accreditation standards in the USA: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Zorek; Cynthia Raehl
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.338

7.  Reliability and learning from the objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  J Roberts; G Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 8.  The evaluation of learner outcomes in interprofessional continuing education: a literature review and an analysis of survey instruments.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillan; Emily Lovrics; Elise Halpern; David Wiljer; Nicole Harnett
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  A pilot study to test the effectiveness of an innovative interprofessional education assessment strategy.

Authors:  Michelle Christine Emmert; Li Cai
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.338

10.  Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice.

Authors:  Esther Suter; Julia Arndt; Nancy Arthur; John Parboosingh; Elizabeth Taylor; Siegrid Deutschlander
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.338

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.