Guang Li1, Jie Wei2, Devin Olek3, Mo Kadbi4, Neelam Tyagi3, Kristen Zakian3, James Mechalakos3, Joseph O Deasy3, Margie Hunt3. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: lig2@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Computer Science, City College of New York, New York, New York. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Philips Healthcare, MR Therapy Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of amplitude-binned 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) reconstructed using 2 concurrent respiratory (navigator and bellows) waveforms. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective, respiratory-correlated 4DMRI scanning program was used to acquire T2-weighted single-breath 4DMRI images with internal navigator and external bellows. After a 10-second training waveform of a surrogate signal, 2-dimensional MRI acquisition was triggered at a level (bin) and anatomic location (slice) until the bin-slice table was completed for 4DMRI reconstruction. The bellows signal was always collected, even when the navigator trigger was used, to retrospectively reconstruct a bellows-rebinned 4DMRI. Ten volunteers participated in this institutional review board-approved 4DMRI study. Four scans were acquired for each subject, including coronal and sagittal scans triggered by either navigator or bellows, and 6 4DMRI images (navigator-triggered, bellows-rebinned, and bellows-triggered) were reconstructed. The simultaneously acquired waveforms and resulting 4DMRI quality were compared using signal correlation, bin/phase shift, and binning motion artifacts. The consecutive bellows-triggered 4DMRI scan was used for indirect comparison. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between the navigator and bellows signals were found to be patient-specific and inhalation-/exhalation-dependent, ranging from 0.1 to 0.9 because of breathing irregularities (>50% scans) and commonly observed bin/phase shifts (-1.1 ± 0.6 bin) in both 1-dimensional waveforms and diaphragm motion extracted from 4D images. Navigator-triggered 4DMRI contained many fewer binning motion artifacts at the diaphragm than did the bellows-rebinned and bellows-triggered 4DMRI scans. Coronal scans were faster than sagittal scans because of the fewer slices and higher achievable acceleration factors. CONCLUSIONS: Navigator-triggered 4DMRI contains substantially fewer binning motion artifacts than bellows-rebinned and bellows-triggered 4DMRI, primarily owing to the deviation of the external from the internal surrogate. The present study compared 2 concurrent surrogates during the same 4DMRI scan and their resulting 4DMRI quality. The navigator-triggered 4DMRI scanning protocol should be preferred to the bellows-based, especially for coronal scans, for clinical respiratory motion simulation.
PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of amplitude-binned 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) reconstructed using 2 concurrent respiratory (navigator and bellows) waveforms. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective, respiratory-correlated 4DMRI scanning program was used to acquire T2-weighted single-breath 4DMRI images with internal navigator and external bellows. After a 10-second training waveform of a surrogate signal, 2-dimensional MRI acquisition was triggered at a level (bin) and anatomic location (slice) until the bin-slice table was completed for 4DMRI reconstruction. The bellows signal was always collected, even when the navigator trigger was used, to retrospectively reconstruct a bellows-rebinned 4DMRI. Ten volunteers participated in this institutional review board-approved 4DMRI study. Four scans were acquired for each subject, including coronal and sagittal scans triggered by either navigator or bellows, and 6 4DMRI images (navigator-triggered, bellows-rebinned, and bellows-triggered) were reconstructed. The simultaneously acquired waveforms and resulting 4DMRI quality were compared using signal correlation, bin/phase shift, and binning motion artifacts. The consecutive bellows-triggered 4DMRI scan was used for indirect comparison. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between the navigator and bellows signals were found to be patient-specific and inhalation-/exhalation-dependent, ranging from 0.1 to 0.9 because of breathing irregularities (>50% scans) and commonly observed bin/phase shifts (-1.1 ± 0.6 bin) in both 1-dimensional waveforms and diaphragm motion extracted from 4D images. Navigator-triggered 4DMRI contained many fewer binning motion artifacts at the diaphragm than did the bellows-rebinned and bellows-triggered 4DMRI scans. Coronal scans were faster than sagittal scans because of the fewer slices and higher achievable acceleration factors. CONCLUSIONS: Navigator-triggered 4DMRI contains substantially fewer binning motion artifacts than bellows-rebinned and bellows-triggered 4DMRI, primarily owing to the deviation of the external from the internal surrogate. The present study compared 2 concurrent surrogates during the same 4DMRI scan and their resulting 4DMRI quality. The navigator-triggered 4DMRI scanning protocol should be preferred to the bellows-based, especially for coronal scans, for clinical respiratory motion simulation.
Authors: Benjamin White; Tianyu Zhao; James Lamb; Sara Wuenschel; Jeffrey Bradley; Issam El Naqa; Daniel Low Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Erik Tryggestad; Aaron Flammang; Russell Hales; Joseph Herman; Junghoon Lee; Todd McNutt; Teboh Roland; Steven M Shea; John Wong Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Daniel A Low; Michelle Nystrom; Eugene Kalinin; Parag Parikh; James F Dempsey; Jeffrey D Bradley; Sasa Mutic; Sasha H Wahab; Tareque Islam; Gary Christensen; David G Politte; Bruce R Whiting Journal: Med Phys Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mary Feng; James M Balter; Daniel Normolle; Saroja Adusumilli; Yue Cao; Thomas L Chenevert; Edgar Ben-Josef Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Guang Li; Naveen C Arora; Huchen Xie; Holly Ning; Wei Lu; Daniel Low; Deborah Citrin; Aradhana Kaushal; Leor Zach; Kevin Camphausen; Robert W Miller Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Guang Li; Jie Wei; Mo Kadbi; Jason Moody; August Sun; Shirong Zhang; Svetlana Markova; Kristen Zakian; Margie Hunt; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joshua N Freedman; David J Collins; Hannah Bainbridge; Christopher M Rank; Simeon Nill; Marc Kachelrieß; Uwe Oelfke; Martin O Leach; Andreas Wetscherek Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Joshua N Freedman; David J Collins; Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Jamie R McClelland; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke; Martin O Leach; Andreas Wetscherek Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 6.280