Haonan Xiao1, Ruiyan Ni1, Shaohua Zhi1, Wen Li1, Chenyang Liu1, Ge Ren1, Xinzhi Teng1, Weiwei Liu2, Weihu Wang2, Yibao Zhang2, Hao Wu2, Ho-Fun Victor Lee3, Lai-Yin Andy Cheung4, Hing-Chiu Charles Chang5, Tian Li1, Jing Cai1. 1. Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. 4. Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China. 5. Department of Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most available four-dimensional (4D)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are limited by insufficient image quality and long acquisition times or require specially designed sequences or hardware that are not available in the clinic. These limitations have greatly hindered the clinical implementation of 4D-MRI. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a fast ultra-quality (UQ) 4D-MRI reconstruction method using a commercially available 4D-MRI sequence and dual-supervised deformation estimation model (DDEM). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients receiving radiotherapy for liver tumors were included. Each patient was scanned using a time-resolved imaging with interleaved stochastic trajectories (TWIST)-lumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MRI sequence to acquire 4D-magnetic resonance (MR) images. They also received 3D T1-/T2-weighted MRI scans as prior images, and UQ 4D-MRI at any instant was considered a deformation of them. A DDEM was developed to obtain a 4D deformable vector field (DVF) from 4D-MRI data, and the prior images were deformed using this 4D-DVF to generate UQ 4D-MR images. The registration accuracies of the DDEM, VoxelMorph (normalized cross-correlation [NCC] supervised), VoxelMorph (end-to-end point error [EPE] supervised), and the parametric total variation (pTV) algorithm were compared. Tumor motion on UQ 4D-MRI was evaluated quantitatively using region of interest (ROI) tracking errors, while image quality was evaluated using the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lung-liver edge sharpness, and perceptual blur metric (PBM). RESULTS: The registration accuracy of the DDEM was significantly better than those of VoxelMorph (NCC supervised), VoxelMorph (EPE supervised), and the pTV algorithm (all, p < 0.001), with an inference time of 69.3 ± 5.9 ms. UQ 4D-MRI yielded ROI tracking errors of 0.79 ± 0.65, 0.50 ± 0.55, and 0.51 ± 0.58 mm in the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and mid-lateral directions, respectively. From the original 4D-MRI to UQ 4D-MRI, the CNR increased from 7.25 ± 4.89 to 18.86 ± 15.81; the lung-liver edge full-width-at-half-maximum decreased from 8.22 ± 3.17 to 3.65 ± 1.66 mm in the in-plane direction and from 8.79 ± 2.78 to 5.04 ± 1.67 mm in the cross-plane direction, and the PBM decreased from 0.68 ± 0.07 to 0.38 ± 0.01. CONCLUSION: This novel DDEM method successfully generated UQ 4D-MR images based on a commercial 4D-MRI sequence. It shows great promise for improving liver tumor motion management during radiation therapy.
BACKGROUND: Most available four-dimensional (4D)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are limited by insufficient image quality and long acquisition times or require specially designed sequences or hardware that are not available in the clinic. These limitations have greatly hindered the clinical implementation of 4D-MRI. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a fast ultra-quality (UQ) 4D-MRI reconstruction method using a commercially available 4D-MRI sequence and dual-supervised deformation estimation model (DDEM). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients receiving radiotherapy for liver tumors were included. Each patient was scanned using a time-resolved imaging with interleaved stochastic trajectories (TWIST)-lumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MRI sequence to acquire 4D-magnetic resonance (MR) images. They also received 3D T1-/T2-weighted MRI scans as prior images, and UQ 4D-MRI at any instant was considered a deformation of them. A DDEM was developed to obtain a 4D deformable vector field (DVF) from 4D-MRI data, and the prior images were deformed using this 4D-DVF to generate UQ 4D-MR images. The registration accuracies of the DDEM, VoxelMorph (normalized cross-correlation [NCC] supervised), VoxelMorph (end-to-end point error [EPE] supervised), and the parametric total variation (pTV) algorithm were compared. Tumor motion on UQ 4D-MRI was evaluated quantitatively using region of interest (ROI) tracking errors, while image quality was evaluated using the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lung-liver edge sharpness, and perceptual blur metric (PBM). RESULTS: The registration accuracy of the DDEM was significantly better than those of VoxelMorph (NCC supervised), VoxelMorph (EPE supervised), and the pTV algorithm (all, p < 0.001), with an inference time of 69.3 ± 5.9 ms. UQ 4D-MRI yielded ROI tracking errors of 0.79 ± 0.65, 0.50 ± 0.55, and 0.51 ± 0.58 mm in the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and mid-lateral directions, respectively. From the original 4D-MRI to UQ 4D-MRI, the CNR increased from 7.25 ± 4.89 to 18.86 ± 15.81; the lung-liver edge full-width-at-half-maximum decreased from 8.22 ± 3.17 to 3.65 ± 1.66 mm in the in-plane direction and from 8.79 ± 2.78 to 5.04 ± 1.67 mm in the cross-plane direction, and the PBM decreased from 0.68 ± 0.07 to 0.38 ± 0.01. CONCLUSION: This novel DDEM method successfully generated UQ 4D-MR images based on a commercial 4D-MRI sequence. It shows great promise for improving liver tumor motion management during radiation therapy.
Authors: Guang Li; Jie Wei; Devin Olek; Mo Kadbi; Neelam Tyagi; Kristen Zakian; James Mechalakos; Joseph O Deasy; Margie Hunt Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Katrinus Keijnemans; Pim T S Borman; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Joost J C Verhoeff; Bas W Raaymakers; Martin F Fast Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 3.609