Literature DB >> 15377116

Linear structures in mammographic images: detection and classification.

Reyer Zwiggelaar1, Susan M Astley, Caroline R M Boggis, Christopher J Taylor.   

Abstract

We describe methods for detecting linear structures in mammograms, and for classifying them into anatomical types (vessels, spicules, ducts, etc). Several different detection methods are compared, using realistic synthetic images and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. There are significant differences (p < 0.001) between the methods, with the best giving an Az value for pixel-level detection of 0.943. We also investigate methods for classifying the detected linear structures into anatomical types, using their cross-sectional profiles, with particular emphasis on recognising the "spicules" and "ducts" associated with some of the more subtle abnormalities. Automatic classification results are compared with expert annotations using ROC analysis, demonstrating useful discrimination between anatomical classes (Az = 0.746). Some of this discrimination relies on simple attributes such as profile width and contrast, but important information is also carried by the shape of the profile (Az = 0.653). The methods presented have potentially wide application in improving the specificity of abnormality detection by exploiting additional anatomical information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15377116     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2004.828675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  15 in total

1.  Multilevel learning-based segmentation of ill-defined and spiculated masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Yimo Tao; Shih-Chung B Lo; Matthew T Freedman; Erini Makariou; Jianhua Xuan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Robert M Nishikawa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Gabor filters and phase portraits for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Fábio J Ayres
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Dual-model automatic detection of nerve-fibres in corneal confocal microscopy images.

Authors:  M A Dabbah; J Graham; I Petropoulos; M Tavakoli; R A Malik
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2010

6.  Global detection approach for clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using a deep learning network.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Robert M Nishikawa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-04-22

7.  Characterizing Architectural Distortion in Mammograms by Linear Saliency.

Authors:  Fabián Narváez; Jorge Alvarez; Juan D Garcia-Arteaga; Jonathan Tarquino; Eduardo Romero
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Locally adaptive decision in detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  María V Sainz de Cea; Robert M Nishikawa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Breast image registration techniques: a survey.

Authors:  Yujun Guo; Radhika Sivaramakrishna; Cheng-Chang Lu; Jasjit S Suri; Swamy Laxminarayan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Delineation of blood vessels in pediatric retinal images using decision trees-based ensemble classification.

Authors:  Muhammad Moazam Fraz; Alicja R Rudnicka; Christopher G Owen; Sarah A Barman
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.