Literature DB >> 9848052

Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.

E D Pisano1, S Zong, B M Hemminger, M DeLuca, R E Johnston, K Muller, M P Braeuning, S M Pizer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to determine whether Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) improves detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. Lines simulating the appearance of spiculations, a common marker of malignancy when visualized with masses, were embedded in dense mammograms digitized at 50 micron pixels, 12 bits deep. Film images with no CLAHE applied were compared to film images with nine different combinations of clip levels and region sizes applied. A simulated spiculation was embedded in a background of dense breast tissue, with the orientation of the spiculation varied. The key variables involved in each trial included the orientation of the spiculation, contrast level of the spiculation and the CLAHE settings applied to the image. Combining the 10 CLAHE conditions, 4 contrast levels and 4 orientations gave 160 combinations. The trials were constructed by pairing 160 combinations of key variables with 40 backgrounds. Twenty student observers were asked to detect the orientation of the spiculation in the image. There was a statistically significant improvement in detection performance for spiculations with CLAHE over unenhanced images when the region size was set at 32 with a clip level of 2, and when the region size was set at 32 with a clip level of 4. The selected CLAHE settings should be tested in the clinic with digital mammograms to determine whether detection of spiculations associated with masses detected at mammography can be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9848052      PMCID: PMC3453156          DOI: 10.1007/bf03178082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  19 in total

1.  Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error.

Authors:  H L Kundel; G Revesz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.

Authors:  F F Yin; M L Giger; K Doi; C E Metz; C J Vyborny; R A Schmidt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting.

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Chandramouli; B M Hemminger; D Glueck; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; D Puff; W Garrett; S Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Chandramouli; B M Hemminger; M DeLuca; D Glueck; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; S Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Psychophysical studies of detection errors in chest radiology.

Authors:  G Revesz; H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.

Authors:  H P Chan; C J Vyborny; H MacMahon; C E Metz; K Doi; E A Sickles
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography.

Authors:  H P Chan; K Doi; S Galhotra; C J Vyborny; H MacMahon; P M Jokich
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.

Authors:  R L Smathers; E Bush; J Drace; M Stevens; F G Sommer; B W Brown; B Karras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Adaptive grey level assignment in CT scan display.

Authors:  S M Pizer; J B Zimmerman; E V Staab
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Enhanced image mammography.

Authors:  M B McSweeney; P Sprawls; R L Egan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  38 in total

1.  An improved protocol for optical projection tomography imaging reveals lobular heterogeneities in pancreatic islet and β-cell mass distribution.

Authors:  Andreas Hörnblad; Abbas Cheddad; Ulf Ahlgren
Journal:  Islets       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluating the effect of a wavelet enhancement method in characterization of simulated lesions embedded in dense breast parenchyma.

Authors:  L Costaridou; S Skiadopoulos; P Sakellaropoulos; E Likaki; C P Kalogeropoulou; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Practical Methods for Bounding Type I Error Rate with an Internal Pilot Design.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; John A Kairalla; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.893

5.  MR volumetric assessment of endolymphatic hydrops.

Authors:  R Gürkov; A Berman; O Dietrich; W Flatz; C Jerin; E Krause; D Keeser; B Ertl-Wagner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Characterizing Architectural Distortion in Mammograms by Linear Saliency.

Authors:  Fabián Narváez; Jorge Alvarez; Juan D Garcia-Arteaga; Jonathan Tarquino; Eduardo Romero
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Application of higher-order spectra for automated grading of diabetic maculopathy.

Authors:  Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; U Rajendra Acharya; Vinod Chandran; Roshan Joy Martis; Jen Hong Tan; Joel E W Koh; Chua Kuang Chua; Louis Tong; Augustinus Laude
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Decision support system for age-related macular degeneration using discrete wavelet transform.

Authors:  Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; U Rajendra Acharya; Joel E W Koh; Chua Kuang Chua; Jen Hong Tan; Vinod Chandran; Choo Min Lim; Kevin Noronha; Augustinus Laude; Louis Tong
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  A motion correction framework for time series sequences in microscopy images.

Authors:  Ankur N Kumar; Kurt W Short; David W Piston
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.127

10.  GLUMIP 2.0: SAS/IML Software for Planning Internal Pilots.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.