Literature DB >> 27975126

Value of postmortem studies in deceased neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit patients.

Raphael Widmann1, Rosmarie Caduff1, Luca Giudici1, Qing Zhong1, Alexander Vogetseder2, Romaine Arlettaz3, Bernhard Frey4, Holger Moch1, Peter K Bode5,6.   

Abstract

Worldwide, various autopsy studies have shown a decrease in the diagnostic error rate over the last years. The cause of this positive development is mainly due to the improvement of modern medicine. However, intensive care unit patients are thought to have a higher risk for diagnostic errors, which is documented in several studies in the adult population. In contrast, there is only limited information about diagnostic errors in pediatrics, particularly in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units. The aims of this study were to analyze the spectrum of childhood death, determine the prevalence and distribution of autopsy-confirmed diagnostic errors, and describe patient characteristics that might have influenced the discordance between antemortem and postmortem findings. We analyzed 143 autopsy reports from 2004 to 2013 and correlated these with clinical reports. The overall autopsy rate during this interval was 20.3%. The leading causes of death were congenital malformations (28%), diseases closely associated with perinatal disorders (25%), disorders of the cardiovascular system (18%), and infections (15%). Additional findings were obtained in 23% of the autopsies. Major diagnostic errors were found in 6%, the lowest reported value in a developed country as yet. Most cases (75%) showed complete concordance between clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings, in line with improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic processes over the last decades. In conclusion, autopsy of neonates, infants, and children represents an important tool for monitoring the quality of pediatric and neonatal medical care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autopsy; Cause of death; Diagnostic error; NICU; PICU

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27975126     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-2056-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  47 in total

1.  Consent to autopsy for neonates.

Authors:  H E McHaffie; P W Fowlie; R Hume; I A Laing; D J Lloyd; A J Lyon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Initial experiences of a minimally invasive autopsy service. A report of the techniques and observations in the first 11 cases.

Authors:  Elspeth H Whitby; Amaka C Offiah; Marta C Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2014-11-11

Review 3.  Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies.

Authors:  Bradford Winters; Jason Custer; Samuel M Galvagno; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Shruti G Kapoor; Heewon Lee; Victoria Goode; Karen Robinson; Atul Nakhasi; Peter Pronovost; David Newman-Toker
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Postmortem studies in the contemporary pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Bettina von Dessauer; Luis Velozo; Carmen Benavente; Fernando Bobenrieth; Jazmina Bongain; José Irazuzta
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 5.  Diagnostic errors in the pediatric and neonatal ICU: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason W Custer; Bradford D Winters; Victoria Goode; Karen A Robinson; Ting Yang; Peter J Pronovost; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland.

Authors:  Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer; Anjeung Kang Bellin; Sinuhe Hahn; Christian De Geyter; Johanna Buechel; Irene Hoesli; Olav Lapaire
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Correlation between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in critically ill children.

Authors:  J J Stambouly; E Kahn; R A Boxer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Prevalence of the neonatal autopsy: a report of the Study Group for Complications of Perinatal Care.

Authors:  S Landers; T MacPherson
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

9.  Autopsy. High yield in neonatal population.

Authors:  H Craft; J E Brazy
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1986-12

10.  Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study.

Authors:  Sudhin Thayyil; Neil J Sebire; Lyn S Chitty; Angie Wade; Wk Chong; Oystein Olsen; Roxana S Gunny; Amaka C Offiah; Catherine M Owens; Dawn E Saunders; Rosemary J Scott; Rod Jones; Wendy Norman; Shea Addison; Alan Bainbridge; Ernest B Cady; Enrico De Vita; Nicola J Robertson; Andrew M Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical autopsies in Switzerland : A status report].

Authors:  A-K Rodewald; P Bode; G Cathomas; H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  What are the participants' perspective and the system-based impact of a standardized, inter-professional morbidity/mortality-conferences in a children's hospital?

Authors:  Martin Stocker; Philipp Szavay; Birgit Wernz; Thomas J Neuhaus; Dirk Lehnick; Sabine Zundel
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-07-25

3.  The Value of Autopsy in Neonates in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Joline L H de Sévaux; Peter G J Nikkels; Maarten H Lequin; Floris Groenendaal
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Diagnostic Errors in Pediatric Critical Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina L Cifra; Jason W Custer; Hardeep Singh; James C Fackler
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.971

5.  AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICAL AND ANATOMOPATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSES IN PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE.

Authors:  Fernanda Staub Rodrigues; Isabella Correa de Oliveira; Mônica Nunes Lima Cat; Maria Clara Lopes Mattos; Gabriela Andrioli Silva
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-12

Review 6.  A pragmatic evidence-based approach to post-mortem perinatal imaging.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; J Ciaran Hutchinson; Celine Lewis; Ian C Simcock; Thivya Sekar; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-15

7.  Autopsy and pre-mortem diagnostic discrepancy review in an Irish tertiary PICU.

Authors:  Mark O'Rahelly; Michael McDermott; Martina Healy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.