Literature DB >> 11420313

Consent to autopsy for neonates.

H E McHaffie1, P W Fowlie, R Hume, I A Laing, D J Lloyd, A J Lyon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine parents' views on autopsy after treatment withdrawal.
DESIGN: Face to face interviews with 59 sets of bereaved parents (108 individual parents) for whose 62 babies there had been discussion of treatment withdrawal.
RESULTS: All except one couple were asked for permission for postmortem examination; 38% refused. The main reasons for declining were concerns about disfigurement, a wish to have the child left in peace, and a feeling that an autopsy was unnecessary because the parents had no unanswered questions. The diagnosis, the age of the child, and the approach of the consultant appeared to influence consent rates. Of those who agreed to autopsies, 92% were given the results by the neonatologist concerned. Whether or not they had agreed to the procedure, at 13 months no parent expressed regrets about their decision.
CONCLUSIONS: Autopsy rates in the East of Scotland stand at 62%. Parents' perceptions are an important element in consent to postmortem examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420313      PMCID: PMC1721284          DOI: 10.1136/fn.85.1.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  19 in total

1.  Government orders inquiry into removal of children's organs.

Authors:  C Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-11

2.  Bristol inquiry into baby deaths to move into new phase.

Authors:  C Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-01

3.  Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  P Kumar; D B Angst; J Taxy; H H Mangurten
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2000-01

4.  West Midlands perinatal mortality survey, 1987. An audit of 300 perinatal autopsies.

Authors:  D I Rushton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-07

5.  To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsy.

Authors:  S J McPhee; K Bottles; B Lo; G Saika; D Crommie
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Factors influencing neonatal autopsy rate.

Authors:  W M Maniscalco; T A Clarke
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1982-09

7.  Parental and physician-related determinants of consent for neonatal autopsy.

Authors:  L J VanMarter; F Taylor; M F Epstein
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1987-02

8.  Autopsy. High yield in neonatal population.

Authors:  H Craft; J E Brazy
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1986-12

Review 9.  Autopsies and the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  D Riggs; R E Weibley
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.278

10.  Characteristics of infants who undergo neonatal autopsy.

Authors:  S Landers; R Kirby; B Harvey; C Langston
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.521

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.

Authors:  C Snowdon; D R Elbourne; J Garcia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Falling rates of perinatal postmortem examination: are we to blame?

Authors:  C Rose; M Evans; J Tooley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Bereaved parents' intentions and suggestions about research autopsies in children with lethal brain tumors.

Authors:  Justin Nathaniel Baker; Jennifer A Windham; Pamela S Hinds; Jami S Gattuso; Belinda Mandrell; Poorna Gajjar; Nancy K West; Teresa Hammarback; Alberto Broniscer
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Value of postmortem studies in deceased neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Raphael Widmann; Rosmarie Caduff; Luca Giudici; Qing Zhong; Alexander Vogetseder; Romaine Arlettaz; Bernhard Frey; Holger Moch; Peter K Bode
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy.

Authors:  Dell Horey; Vicki Flenady; Liz Conway; Emma McLeod; Teck Yee Khong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  [Fetal autopsies : Relic or still a gold standard?]

Authors:  J Andruszkow; W Weichert; T Braunschweig; R Knüchel-Clarke; F Erlmeier
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination.

Authors:  Judith Rankin; Chris Wright; Tom Lind
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

8.  X-ray phase contrast tomography; proof of principle for post-mortem imaging.

Authors:  Anna Zamir; Owen J Arthurs; Charlotte K Hagen; Paul C Diemoz; Thierry Brochard; Alberto Bravin; Neil J Sebire; Alessandro Olivo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications.

Authors:  Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16

Review 10.  Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  S Addison; O J Arthurs; S Thayyil
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.