Christina L Cifra1, Jason W Custer2, Hardeep Singh3, James C Fackler4. 1. Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA. 2. Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD. 3. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 4. Division of Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the literature on prevalence, impact, and contributing factors related to diagnostic error in the PICU. DATA SOURCES: Search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Studies on diagnostic error and the diagnostic process in pediatric critical care were included. Non-English studies with no translation, case reports/series, studies providing no information on diagnostic error, studies focused on non-PICU populations, and studies focused on a single condition/disease or a single diagnostic test/tool were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on research design, objectives, study sample, and results pertaining to the prevalence, impact, and factors associated with diagnostic error were abstracted from each study. DATA SYNTHESIS: Using independent tiered review, 396 abstracts were screened, and 17 studies (14 full-text, 3 abstracts) were ultimately included. Fifteen of 17 studies (88%) had an observational research design. Autopsy studies (autopsy rates were 20-47%) showed a 10-23% rate of missed major diagnoses; 5-16% of autopsy-discovered diagnostic errors had a potential adverse impact on survival and would have changed management. Retrospective record reviews reported varying rates of diagnostic error from 8% in a general PICU population to 12% among unexpected critical admissions and 21-25% of patients discussed at PICU morbidity and mortality conferences. Cardiovascular, infectious, congenital, and neurologic conditions were most commonly misdiagnosed. Systems factors (40-67%), cognitive factors (20-3%), and both systems and cognitive factors (40%) were associated with diagnostic error. Limited information was available on the impact of misdiagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of diagnostic errors in the PICU is limited. Future work to understand diagnostic errors should involve a balanced focus between studying the diagnosis of individual diseases and uncovering common system- and process-related determinants of diagnostic error.
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the literature on prevalence, impact, and contributing factors related to diagnostic error in the PICU. DATA SOURCES: Search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Studies on diagnostic error and the diagnostic process in pediatric critical care were included. Non-English studies with no translation, case reports/series, studies providing no information on diagnostic error, studies focused on non-PICU populations, and studies focused on a single condition/disease or a single diagnostic test/tool were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on research design, objectives, study sample, and results pertaining to the prevalence, impact, and factors associated with diagnostic error were abstracted from each study. DATA SYNTHESIS: Using independent tiered review, 396 abstracts were screened, and 17 studies (14 full-text, 3 abstracts) were ultimately included. Fifteen of 17 studies (88%) had an observational research design. Autopsy studies (autopsy rates were 20-47%) showed a 10-23% rate of missed major diagnoses; 5-16% of autopsy-discovered diagnostic errors had a potential adverse impact on survival and would have changed management. Retrospective record reviews reported varying rates of diagnostic error from 8% in a general PICU population to 12% among unexpected critical admissions and 21-25% of patients discussed at PICU morbidity and mortality conferences. Cardiovascular, infectious, congenital, and neurologic conditions were most commonly misdiagnosed. Systems factors (40-67%), cognitive factors (20-3%), and both systems and cognitive factors (40%) were associated with diagnostic error. Limited information was available on the impact of misdiagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of diagnostic errors in the PICU is limited. Future work to understand diagnostic errors should involve a balanced focus between studying the diagnosis of individual diseases and uncovering common system- and process-related determinants of diagnostic error.
Authors: Traber Davis Giardina; Helen Haskell; Shailaja Menon; Julia Hallisy; Frederick S Southwick; Urmimala Sarkar; Kathryn E Royse; Hardeep Singh Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Adam Z Fink; Terry L Levin; Einat Blumfield; Sheri L Nemerofsky; Mark C Liszewski; Kandi George; Suhas Nafday; Mark Shlomovich; K Allen Eddington; Eliza H Myers; H Michael Ushay Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Maria Caridad Davalos; Kenya Samuels; Ashley N D Meyer; Satid Thammasitboon; Moushumi Sur; Kevin Roy; Aymer Al-Mutairi; Hardeep Singh Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Ali S Saber Tehrani; HeeWon Lee; Simon C Mathews; Andrew Shore; Martin A Makary; Peter J Pronovost; David E Newman-Toker Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Bernhard Frey; Carsten Doell; Dietrich Klauwer; Vincenzo Cannizzaro; Vera Bernet; Christine Maguire; Barbara Brotschi Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Uri Pollak; Yael Feinstein; Candace N Mannarino; Mary E McBride; Malaika Mendonca; Eitan Keizman; David Mishaly; Grace van Leeuwen; Peter P Roeleveld; Lena Koers; Darren Klugman Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 3.569