Jason W Custer1, Bradford D Winters, Victoria Goode, Karen A Robinson, Ting Yang, Peter J Pronovost, David E Newman-Toker. 1. 1Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD. 2Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 3Welsh Library for the School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 4Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 5Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic errors lead to preventable hospital morbidity and mortality. ICU patients may be at particularly high risk for misdiagnosis. Little is known about misdiagnosis in pediatrics, including PICU and neonatal ICU. We sought to assess diagnostic errors in PICU and neonatal ICU settings by systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. STUDY SELECTION: We identified observational studies reporting autopsy-confirmed diagnostic errors in PICU or neonatal ICU using standard Goldman criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: We abstracted patient characteristics, diagnostic error description, rates and error classes using standard Goldman criteria for autopsy misdiagnoses and calculated descriptive statistics. DATA SYNTHESIS: We screened 329 citations, examined 79 full-text articles, and included 13 studies (seven PICU; six neonatal ICU). The PICU studies examined a total of 1,063 deaths and 498 autopsies. Neonatal ICU studies examined a total of 2,124 neonatal deaths and 1,259 autopsies. Major diagnostic errors were found in 19.6% of autopsied PICU and neonatal ICU deaths (class I, 4.5%; class II, 15.1%). Class I (potentially lethal) misdiagnoses in the PICU (43% infections, 37% vascular) and neonatal ICU (62% infections, 21% congenital/metabolic) differed slightly. Although missed infections were most common in both settings, missed vascular events were more common in the PICU and missed congenital conditions in the neonatal ICU. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic errors in PICU/neonatal ICU populations are most commonly due to infection. Further research is needed to better quantify pediatric intensive care-related misdiagnosis and to define potential strategies to reduce their frequency or mitigate misdiagnosis-related harm.
OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic errors lead to preventable hospital morbidity and mortality. ICU patients may be at particularly high risk for misdiagnosis. Little is known about misdiagnosis in pediatrics, including PICU and neonatal ICU. We sought to assess diagnostic errors in PICU and neonatal ICU settings by systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. STUDY SELECTION: We identified observational studies reporting autopsy-confirmed diagnostic errors in PICU or neonatal ICU using standard Goldman criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: We abstracted patient characteristics, diagnostic error description, rates and error classes using standard Goldman criteria for autopsy misdiagnoses and calculated descriptive statistics. DATA SYNTHESIS: We screened 329 citations, examined 79 full-text articles, and included 13 studies (seven PICU; six neonatal ICU). The PICU studies examined a total of 1,063 deaths and 498 autopsies. Neonatal ICU studies examined a total of 2,124 neonatal deaths and 1,259 autopsies. Major diagnostic errors were found in 19.6% of autopsied PICU and neonatal ICU deaths (class I, 4.5%; class II, 15.1%). Class I (potentially lethal) misdiagnoses in the PICU (43% infections, 37% vascular) and neonatal ICU (62% infections, 21% congenital/metabolic) differed slightly. Although missed infections were most common in both settings, missed vascular events were more common in the PICU and missed congenital conditions in the neonatal ICU. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic errors in PICU/neonatal ICU populations are most commonly due to infection. Further research is needed to better quantify pediatric intensive care-related misdiagnosis and to define potential strategies to reduce their frequency or mitigate misdiagnosis-related harm.
Authors: Priya N Bhat; John M Costello; Ranjit Aiyagari; Paul J Sharek; Claudia A Algaze; Mjaye L Mazwi; Stephen J Roth; Andrew Y Shin Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Lucy M Perrem; Thomas R Fanshawe; Farhana Sharif; Annette Plüddemann; Michael B O'Neill Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: D Peterson; S B Hoffman; D El-Metwally; M Martino-Gomez; D R Chinta; C Hughes Driscoll Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Christina L Cifra; Patrick Ten Eyck; Jeffrey D Dawson; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Hardeep Singh; Loreen A Herwaldt Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.624