Literature DB >> 34264420

A pragmatic evidence-based approach to post-mortem perinatal imaging.

Susan C Shelmerdine1,2,3, J Ciaran Hutchinson4,5,6, Celine Lewis7,8, Ian C Simcock4,5,6, Thivya Sekar4,5,6, Neil J Sebire4,5,6, Owen J Arthurs4,5,6.   

Abstract

Post-mortem imaging has a high acceptance rate amongst parents and healthcare professionals as a non-invasive method for investigating perinatal deaths. Previously viewed as a 'niche' subspecialty, it is becoming increasingly requested, with general radiologists now more frequently asked to oversee and advise on appropriate imaging protocols. Much of the current literature to date has focussed on diagnostic accuracy and clinical experiences of individual centres and their imaging techniques (e.g. post-mortem CT, MRI, ultrasound and micro-CT), and pragmatic, evidence-based guidance for how to approach such referrals in real-world practice is lacking. In this review, we summarise the latest research and provide an approach and flowchart to aid decision-making for perinatal post-mortem imaging. We highlight key aspects of the maternal and antenatal history that radiologists should consider when protocolling studies (e.g. antenatal imaging findings and history), and emphasise important factors that could impact the diagnostic quality of post-mortem imaging examinations (e.g. post-mortem weight and time interval). Considerations regarding when ancillary post-mortem image-guided biopsy tests are beneficial are also addressed, and we provide key references for imaging protocols for a variety of cross-sectional imaging modalities.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autopsy; Diagnostic imaging; Foetus; Pregnancy loss; Radiology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34264420     DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01042-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insights Imaging        ISSN: 1869-4101


  47 in total

Review 1.  Value of the perinatal autopsy: critique.

Authors:  Sanne J Gordijn; Jan Jaap H M Erwich; T Yee Khong
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2002-09-04

2.  A difficult conversation? The views and experiences of parents and professionals on the consent process for perinatal postmortem after stillbirth.

Authors:  A E P Heazell; M-J McLaughlin; E B Schmidt; P Cox; V Flenady; T Y Khong; S Downe
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and its impact on genetic counseling.

Authors:  Shalini S Nayak; Anju Shukla; Leslie Lewis; Rajagopal Kadavigere; Mary Mathew; Prashanth K Adiga; Akhila Vasudeva; Pratap Kumar; Jyothi Shetty; Hitesh Shah; Katta M Girisha
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Concordance between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings in a tertiary center.

Authors:  M Angeles Rodriguez; Pilar Prats; Ignacio Rodríguez; Victoria Cusí; Carmina Comas
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Value of postmortem studies in deceased neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Raphael Widmann; Rosmarie Caduff; Luca Giudici; Qing Zhong; Alexander Vogetseder; Romaine Arlettaz; Bernhard Frey; Holger Moch; Peter K Bode
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Diagnostic value of perinatal autopsies: analysis of 486 cases.

Authors:  Nalan Neşe; Yeşim Bülbül
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 7.  Latest developments in post-mortem foetal imaging.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; John C Hutchinson; Owen J Arthurs; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: factors affecting determination of cause of death at autopsy.

Authors:  J Man; J C Hutchinson; A E Heazell; M Ashworth; S Levine; N J Sebire
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting.

Authors:  C Lewis; M Hill; O J Arthurs; C Hutchinson; L S Chitty; N J Sebire
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 10.  Perinatal death investigations: What is current practice?

Authors:  J W Nijkamp; N J Sebire; K Bouman; F J Korteweg; J J H M Erwich; S J Gordijn
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.

Authors:  Y Dawood; C Honhoff; A-S van der Post; S D Roosendaal; B F Coolen; G J Strijkers; E Pajkrt; B S de Bakker
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 8.678

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.