| Literature DB >> 27965526 |
JinWook Choi1, Soram Oh1, Yu-Chan Kim2, Kwang-Koo Jee3, KeeYeon Kum4, SeokWoo Chang1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare fracture resistances of K3 nickel-titanium files made from different thermal treatments. K3 (SybronEndo, Orange, CA), K3XF (SybronEndo), and experimentally heat treated K3 (K3H) were used. For the cyclic fatigue test, the samples were rotated with up-and-down motion in the artificial canal with the curvature of 60 degrees until the fracture occurred. The number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was measured. For the torsional fracture test, the samples were tightly bound and rotated until the fracture occurred. Elastic modulus (EM), ultimate torsional strength (UTS), and angle of rotation to fracture (ARF) were measured. The results were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA. The NCF of K3H was higher than those of K3 and K3XF (P < 0.05). The EM of K3XF and K3H was lower than that of K3 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in UTS. The ARF of K3XF was higher than that of K3 (P < 0.05). K3XF and K3H showed more flexibility than K3. The maximum torsional angle of K3XF was higher than that of K3, but there was no significant difference on the UTS in all three groups.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27965526 PMCID: PMC5124639 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6374721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Figure 1(a) Fatigue tester (Denbotix, Bucheon, Korea). (b) Artificial canal of fatigue tester; right part (curvature angle of 60°) was used in this study. (c) Torsion testing machine (Vortex-i, Macmesin Co., West Sussex, UK). (d) NiTi file engagement of (c) was magnified.
Cyclic fatigue resistance and torsional resistance (mean ± standard deviation).
| Cyclic fatigue resistance | Torsional resistance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| NCF | UTS (Ncm) | ARF (°) | |
| K3 | 1683.0 ± 349.4a | 3.31 ± 0.55a | 526.4 ± 110.7a |
| K3XF | 1995.0 ± 295.5a | 3.14 ± 0.42a | 678.0 ± 96.5b |
| K3H | 17760.5 ± 5199.4b | 3.70 ± 0.73a | 605.1 ± 133.0a,b |
Different superscript letters in the same column indicate a statistically significant difference between groups (P < 0.05).
NCF: number of cycles to fracture; UTS: ultimate torsional strength; ARF: angle of rotation to fracture.
Figure 2Mean torsional torque-rotated angle curves.
Elastic modulus of NiTi files (mean ± standard deviation).
| Elastic modulus (Ncm/ | |
|---|---|
| K3 | 0.43 ± 0.08a |
| K3XF | 0.27 ± 0.06b |
| K3H | 0.22 ± 0.05b |
Different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference between groups (P < 0.05).
Figure 3SEM images of fractured surfaces of files after cyclic fatigue fracture test (a–f) and torsional fracture test (g–l). SEM images of lateral surface of unused files (m–o). (a, d, g, j, m) K3, (b, e, h, k, n) K3XF, and (c, f, i, l, o) K3H.