Literature DB >> 19741248

Spatiotemporal interactions in retinal prosthesis subjects.

Alan Horsager1, Robert J Greenberg, Ione Fine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vision loss due to retinitis pigmentosa affects an estimated 15 million people worldwide. Through collaboration between Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., and the Doheny Eye Institute, six blind human subjects underwent implantation with epiretinal 4 x 4 electrode arrays designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina, with the goal of restoring functional vision by applying spatiotemporal patterns of stimulation. To better understand spatiotemporal interactions between electrodes during synchronous and asynchronous stimulation, the authors investigated how percepts changed as a function of pulse timing across the electrodes.
METHODS: Pulse trains (20, 40, 80, and 160 Hz) were presented on groups of electrodes with 800, 1600, or 2400 microm center-to-center separation. Stimulation was either synchronous (pulses were presented simultaneously across electrodes) or asynchronous (pulses were phase shifted). Using a same-different discrimination task, the authors were able to evaluate how the perceptual quality of the stimuli changed as a function of phase shifts across multiple electrodes.
RESULTS: Even after controlling for electric field interactions, subjects could discriminate between spatiotemporal pulse train patterns based on differences of phase across electrodes as small as 3 ms. These findings suggest that the quality of the percept is affected not only by electric field interactions but also by spatiotemporal interactions at the neural level.
CONCLUSIONS: During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on the quality of the percept. Understanding how these spatiotemporal interactions at the neural level influence percepts during multielectrode stimulation is fundamental to the successful design of a retinal prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19741248      PMCID: PMC2868442          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  66 in total

1.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  How the retinal network reacts to epiretinal stimulation to form the prosthetic visual input to the cortex.

Authors:  Nicolas P Cottaris; Sylvia D Elfar
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Visual task performance in blind humans with retinal prosthetic implants.

Authors:  J D Weiland; D Yanai; M Mahadevappa; R Williamson; B V Mech; G Y Fujii; J Little; R J Greenberg; E de Juan; M S Humayun
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Timing and computation in inner retinal circuitry.

Authors:  Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 19.318

5.  Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input.

Authors:  David J Margolis; Gregory Newkirk; Thomas Euler; Peter B Detwiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A neural cocktail-party processor.

Authors:  C von der Malsburg; W Schneider
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  A model for visual shape recognition.

Authors:  P M Milner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Visual hyperacuity:spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision.

Authors:  M Fahle; T Poggio
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1981-11-24

9.  Correlated firing of cat retinal ganglion cells. II. Responses of X- and Y-cells to single quantal events.

Authors:  D N Mastronarde
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Scott H Greenwald; James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  27 in total

1.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Retinoid receptors trigger neuritogenesis in retinal degenerations.

Authors:  Yanhua Lin; Bryan W Jones; Aihua Liu; James F Tucker; Kevin Rapp; Ling Luo; Wolfgang Baehr; Paul S Bernstein; Carl B Watt; Jia-Hui Yang; Marguerite V Shaw; Robert E Marc
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Robert J Greenberg; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Are long stimulus pulse durations the answer to improving spatial resolution in retinal prostheses?

Authors:  Matthew A Petoe; Mohit N Shivdasani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-11

Review 7.  Retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Active confocal imaging for visual prostheses.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Doron Aloni; Yitzhak Yitzhaky; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Virally delivered channelrhodopsin-2 safely and effectively restores visual function in multiple mouse models of blindness.

Authors:  M Mehdi Doroudchi; Kenneth P Greenberg; Jianwen Liu; Kimberly A Silka; Edward S Boyden; Jennifer A Lockridge; A Cyrus Arman; Ramesh Janani; Shannon E Boye; Sanford L Boye; Gabriel M Gordon; Benjamin C Matteo; Alapakkam P Sampath; William W Hauswirth; Alan Horsager
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.