Literature DB >> 15790920

Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes.

Ralph J Jensen1, Ofer R Ziv, Joseph F Rizzo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the responses of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to electrical stimulation, using electrodes comparable in size to those used in human studies investigating the feasibility of an electronic retinal prosthesis.
METHODS: Rabbit retinas were stimulated in vitro with current pulses applied to the inner surface with 125- and 500-mum diameter electrodes while the responses of RGCs were recorded extracellularly.
RESULTS: Both short-latency (SL; 3-5 ms) and long-latency (LL; >/=9 ms) responses were observed after electrical stimulation within the receptive field of an RGC. With short, 0.1-ms current pulses, the threshold current for the SL cell response was significantly lower than that for the LL cell response. With long (10- to 20-ms) pulses, the threshold currents for the SL and LL cell responses were very similar. The threshold current for the SL cell response increased more steeply than did the LL cell response when the electrode was displaced from the point of lowest electrical threshold, either above or along the surface of the retina. Stimulation of an RGC axon outside of the cell's receptive field produced only an SL response. For 0.1-ms duration pulses, the threshold current for the axonal response was significantly higher than the threshold current for the SL cell response. At pulse durations > 1 ms, the thresholds were very similar.
CONCLUSIONS: RGC responses to electrical stimulation depend on the current pulse duration and location of the stimulating electrode. For an epiretinal prosthesis, short-duration current pulses may be preferable since they result in a more localized activation of the retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15790920     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  55 in total

1.  The effect of waveform asymmetry on perception with epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Kathleen E Finn; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Uday Patel; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Arup Roy; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Jim Loudin; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Inner retinal mechanisms engaged by retinal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Eyal Margalit; Wallace B Thoreson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Shelley I Fried; Aaron C W Lasker; Neal J Desai; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  An in vitro model of a retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Ashish K Ahuja; Matthew R Behrend; Masako Kuroda; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits.

Authors:  Liming Li; Pengjia Cao; Mingjie Sun; Xinyu Chai; Kaijie Wu; Xun Xu; Xiaoxin Li; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Punita Christopher; Jianing Wei; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Uday Patel; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.