| Literature DB >> 27938325 |
Shruti Talukdar1, Madhumita Talukdar1, Manorama Buragohain1, Archana Yadav1, R N S Yadav2, T C Bora3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microorganisms are a rich source of structurally diverse secondary metabolites that exert a major impact on the control of infectious diseases and other medical conditions. The biosynthesis of these metabolites can be improved by manipulating the nutritional or environmental factors. This work evaluates the effects of fermentation parameters on the production of a lactone compound effective against Candida albicans by Penicillium verruculosum MKH7 under submerged fermentation. Design-Expert version8.0 software was used for construction of the experimental design and statistical analysis of the experimental data.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27938325 PMCID: PMC5225592 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0713-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree showing relationship Penicillium verruculosum MKH7 and related taxa, based on analysis of ITS region. The numbers on the nodes indicate how often (no. of times, %) the species to the right are grouped together in 100 bootstrap samples. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici ATCC 34298 was used as an outgroup. Bar, 0.05 substitution per site
Fig. 2Predicted structure of the antifungal metabolite
Levels of the factors tested in the Plackett-Burman design
| Factor | Code level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |
| A-Dextrose (g/l) | 20 | 25 | 30 |
| B-Peptone (g/l) | 5 | 7.5 | 10 |
| C-Initial pH | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| D-Temperature (°C) | 25 | 30 | 35 |
| E-NaCl (g/l) | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| F-Fermentation time (days) | 10 | 12.5 | 15 |
| G- MgSO4.7H2O (g/l) | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Plackett-Burman design matrix for evaluating significant factors affecting candicidal metabolite production by Penicillium verruculosum
| Run | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | Yield (mg/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 3.1 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 3.3 |
| 3 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.2 |
| 4 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 3.7 |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 30.5 |
| 6 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 7 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 6.4 |
| 8 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 15.5 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 18.0 |
| 10 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 15.2 |
| 11 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 3.6 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 3.5 |
*H, I, J, K- Dummy variables
ANOVA of the Plackett-Burman Design
| Source | SS | DF | MS |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 784.52 | 7 | 112.07 | 6.93 | 0.0401 |
| Dextrose | 93.52 | 1 | 93.52 | 5.78 | 0.0740 |
| Peptone | 124.81 | 1 | 124.81 | 7.72 | 0.0499 |
| Initial pH | 169.50 | 1 | 169.50 | 10.48 | 0.0317 |
| Temperature | 124.81 | 1 | 124.81 | 7.72 | 0.0499 |
| NaCl | 91.30 | 1 | 91.30 | 5.65 | 0.0763 |
| Fermentation time | 17.04 | 1 | 17.04 | 1.05 | 0.3627 |
| MgSO4.7H2O | 163.54 | 1 | 163.54 | 10.11 | 0.0335 |
*SS sum of squares, DF degrees of freedom, MS mean square
Central Composite Design in coded units
| Run | Initial pH (A) | Temperature (B) | Peptone (C) | MgSO4.7H2O (D) | Metabolite yield (mg/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 217.56 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 70.34 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 67.8 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 73.78 |
| 5 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 73.78 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 55 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210.7 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 32.15 |
| 9 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 71.32 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210.65 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 217.5 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 66.2 |
| 13 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 77.7 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 80.25 |
| 15 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 75.2 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 205.5 |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 75 |
| 18 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 80.14 |
| 19 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 62 |
| 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 |
| 21 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 66.5 |
| 22 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 78.5 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 205.46 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 77.58 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 51.3 |
| 26 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 70.85 |
| 27 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 46.76 |
| 28 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 48 |
| 29 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 |
| 30 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 78.45 |
Regression results of the CCD
| Factor | Coefficient estimate |
| Prob > | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 211.23 | |||
| Model | 71.36 | <0.0001 | Significant | |
| A | −2.25 | 1.20 | 0.2911 | |
| B | −4.3 | 4.39 | 0.0536 | |
| C | 2.4 | 1.34 | 0.2643 | |
| D | 2.9 | 2.06 | 0.1718 | |
| AB | −2.41 | 0.92 | 0.3529 | |
| AC | 1.05 | 0.18 | 0.6811 | |
| AD | 0.79 | 0.098 | 0.7581 | |
| BC | −2.17 | 0.74 | 0.4024 | |
| BD | −5.2 | 4.26 | 0.0567 | |
| CD | −5.44 | 4.69 | 0.0469 | |
| A2 | −34.2 | 316.76 | <0.0001 | |
| B2 | −37.99 | 391.87 | <0.0001 | |
| C2 | −36.5 | 360.97 | <0.0001 | |
| D2 | −34.74 | 327.56 | <0.0001 |
*Lack of Fit = 4.69, Coefficient of Variation (%) = 10.41, R2 = 0.9852, Adj R-Squared = 0.9714, Pred R-Squared = 0.9210
Fig. 3Plot of the observed versus the predicted response
Fig. 4Normal probability of internally studentized residuals
Fig. 5Plot of internally studentized residuals vs. predicted response
Fig. 6Response surface curve showing the various interaction effects. a Initial pH and temperature (b) Initial pH and peptone (c) Initial pH and MgSO4. 7H2O (d) Temperature and peptone (e) Temperature and MgSO4. 7H2O (f) Peptone and MgSO4. 7H2O
Fig. 7Antibiotic stability in different pH (a) and temperatures (b)