| Literature DB >> 22082189 |
Yonghong Wang1, Xiangling Fang, Fengqiu An, Guohong Wang, Xing Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The production of secondary metabolites with antibiotic properties is a common characteristic to entomopathogenic bacteria Xenorhabdus spp. These metabolites not only have diverse chemical structures but also have a wide range of bioactivities with medicinal and agricultural interests such as antibiotic, antimycotic and insecticidal, nematicidal and antiulcer, antineoplastic and antiviral. It has been known that cultivation parameters are critical to the secondary metabolites produced by microorganisms. Even small changes in the culture medium may not only impact the quantity of certain compounds but also the general metabolic profile of microorganisms. Manipulating nutritional or environmental factors can promote the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and thus facilitate the discovery of new natural products. This work was conducted to evaluate the influence of nutrition on the antibiotic production of X. bovienii YL002 and to optimize the medium to maximize its antibiotic production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22082189 PMCID: PMC3227641 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-98
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Figure 1The effect of different media on DCW (A) and antibiotic activity (B) of .
Figure 2The effect of different carbon (A) and nitrogen (B) sources on antibiotic activity of .
Experimental range and level of the independent variables
| Variable | Parameter | Range and level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.682 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1.682 | ||
| Glycerol (g/L) | 1.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | |
| Soytone (g/L) | 5.0 | 9.0 | 15.0 | 21.0 | 25.0 | |
| Minerals (g/L) | 3.0 | 4.2 | 6.2 | 8.2 | 9.4 | |
x = coded value of the variable X.
x1 = (Glucose - 5)/2; x2 = (Peptone - 15)/6; x3 = (Minerals - 6.2)/2.
CCD plan of coded value, the observed value and predicted value
| Run | Observed value (U/mL) | Predicted value (U/mL) | Residual | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 305.0 | 300.59440 | 4.40560 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 270.0 | 269.50019 | 0.49981 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 266.7 | 263.28293 | 3.41707 |
| 4 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 271.7 | 264.68872 | 7.01128 |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 280.0 | 278.74159 | 1.25841 |
| 6 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 250.0 | 245.14737 | 4.85263 |
| 7 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 241.7 | 233.93012 | 7.76988 |
| 8 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 236.7 | 232.83590 | 3.86410 |
| 9 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 | 285.0 | 290.12933 | -5.12933 |
| 10 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 238.4 | 244.96290 | -6.56290 |
| 11 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 | 290.0 | 292.56256 | -2.56256 |
| 12 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 241.7 | 250.82967 | -9.12967 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 | 256.7 | 262.73135 | -6.03135 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 230.0 | 235.66088 | -5.66088 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 280.0 | 291.33368 | -11.33368 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 296.7 | 291.33368 | 5.36632 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300.0 | 291.33368 | 8.66632 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 283.3 | 291.33368 | -8.03368 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 290.0 | 291.33368 | -1.33368 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300.0 | 291.33368 | 8.66632 |
Parameter estimates for factorial design experiments.
| Effect | Parameter estimate | Standard error | Computed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 291.3337 | 3.607650 | 80.75441 | 0.000000 |
| 13.4264 | 2.393452 | 5.60964 | 0.000225 | |
| -8.4081 | 2.329651 | -3.60917 | 0.004775 | |
| 12.4057 | 2.393452 | 5.18320 | 0.000411 | |
| -6.9412 | 2.329651 | -2.97951 | 0.013819 | |
| 8.0471 | 2.393452 | 3.36213 | 0.007216 | |
| -14.8942 | 2.329651 | -6.39332 | 0.000079 | |
| -1.8750 | 3.127355 | -0.59955 | 0.562145 | |
| -0.6250 | 3.127355 | -0.19985 | 0.845604 | |
| 8.1250 | 3.127355 | 2.59804 | 0.026581 |
Univariate tests of significance, effect sizes, and powers for antibiotic activity sigma-restricted parameterization and effective hypothesis decomposition
| Effect | SS | DF | MS | Partial eta-squared | Non- | Observed power (alpha = 0.05) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 510243.0 | 1 | 510243.0 | 6521.276 | 0.000000 | 0.998469 | 6521.276 | 1.000000 |
| 2462.2 | 1 | 2462.2 | 31.468 | 0.000225 | 0.758851 | 31.468 | 0.998878 | |
| 1019.2 | 1 | 1019.2 | 13.026 | 0.004775 | 0.565710 | 13.026 | 0.900843 | |
| 2102.0 | 1 | 2102.0 | 26.866 | 0.000411 | 0.728744 | 26.866 | 0.996323 | |
| 694.6 | 1 | 694.6 | 8.877 | 0.013819 | 0.470268 | 8.877 | 0.765827 | |
| 884.5 | 1 | 884.5 | 11.304 | 0.007216 | 0.530603 | 11.304 | 0.856889 | |
| 3198.1 | 1 | 3198.1 | 40.875 | 0.000079 | 0.803438 | 40.875 | 0.999909 | |
| 28.1 | 1 | 28.1 | 0.359 | 0.562145 | 0.034699 | 0.359 | 0.084539 | |
| 3.1 | 1 | 3.1 | 0.040 | 0.845604 | 0.003978 | 0.040 | 0.053780 | |
| 528.1 | 1 | 528.1 | 6.750 | 0.026581 | 0.402979 | 6.750 | 0.649570 | |
| Error | 782.4 | 10 | 78.2 |
Figure 3Pareto chart of .
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the quadratic model
| Source of variations | DF | SS | MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7 | 10216.7500 | 1459.53600 | 21.525010 | 0.000007** |
| Residual | 12 | 813.6782 | 67.80652 | ||
| Lack of fit | 7 | 440.5649 | 62.93784 | 0.843414 | 0.596740 |
| Pure error | 5 | 373.1133 | 74.62267 | ||
| Total | 19 | 11030.4282 |
R = Coefficient of correlation = 0.962410; R2 = Coefficient of determination = 0.926233; adjusted R2 = 0.883203.
** Significant at 1% level.
Figure 4Residual diagnostics of the contour surface of the quadratic model. A) The predicted vs. observed by replicates of antibiotic activity of Xenorhabdus bovienii YL002. B) Normal probability of internally studentized residuals. C) Plot of internally studentized residuals vs. predicted response.
Figure 5Response surface plot and contour plot. A) The combined effects of glycerol and soytone on the antibiotic activity of Xenorhabdus bovienii YL002. B) The combined effects of glycerol and minerals on the antibiotic activity of X. bovienii YL002. C) The combined effects of soytone and minerals on the antibiotic activity of X. bovienii YL002.
Figure 6Desirability charts of variables for maximum response.