Literature DB >> 2791811

Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects.

J A Wilson1, A Pryde, A Cecilia, C C Macintyre, R C Heading.   

Abstract

Upper esophageal manometry is technically problematic. Published normal values are, therefore, few and wide ranging, reflecting catheter and recording-system variables, while the reproducibility of measurements and the influence of food consistency have been little studied. In this investigation, 50 healthy volunteers were studied with (1) a 2.8-mm-diameter six-sensor catheter-mounted transducer assembly and (2) a 3.2 X 7.2-mm sleeve device linked to a computerized recorder with a pressure-sample rate of 32/sec. The study protocol included water, bread, and semisolid swallows. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) tonic pressures measured with the catheter-mounted assembly were lower and more reproducible than pressures measured with the sleeve system. Compared with water, bread swallows showed greater pharyngeal and sphincter after-contraction pressures, while semisolid swallows had less complete sphincter relaxation. Duration of pharyngoesophageal contractions was greater with bread or semisolid than water. The observations have established normal values for measurements of UES function and, in addition, have shown that (1) catheter variables significantly influence the measurement of upper sphincter tonic pressure, (2) pressures recorded with the catheter-mounted transducer are most reproducible, and (3) pharyngoesophageal motility patterns vary significantly according to the substance swallowed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2791811     DOI: 10.1007/bf01537116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  48 in total

1.  The dynamics of swallowing. I. Normal pharyngeal mechanisms.

Authors:  M ATKINSON; P KRAMER; S M WYMAN; F J INGELFINGER
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1957-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Resting and deglutition pressures in the pharyngoesophageal region.

Authors:  F E FYKE; C F CODE
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1955-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Pressure profile of esophageal peristalsis in normal humans as measured by direct intraesophageal transducers.

Authors:  T J Humphries; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-07

4.  Analysis of pressure generation and bolus transit during pharyngeal swallowing.

Authors:  F M McConnel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  A qualitative analysis of the frequency response characteristics of a hydraulic esophageal manometry system.

Authors:  P E Engler; R Goldman; H P Greisler; L H Stahlgren
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  1986-02

6.  Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R C Arndorfer; J J Stef; W J Dodds; J H Linehan; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  The pharyngoesophageal closure mechanism: a manometric study.

Authors:  C S Winans
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Assessment of various factors influencing esophageal pressure measurement. I. Significance of methodical factors in intraluminal manometry.

Authors:  T R Weihrauch; A Brummer; H Biewener; K Ewe
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1980-03-17

9.  Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; W J Dodds; J Dent; J A Logemann; R Shaker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Psychiatric illness and contraction abnormalities of the esophagus.

Authors:  R E Clouse; P J Lustman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  17 in total

1.  Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  P Alonso; E Estévez; C Aba; B González-Conde; J Yáñez; J L Vázquez-Iglesias
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Pharyngoesophageal manometry with an original balloon sensor probe for the study of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Sandro Mattioli; Marialuisa Lugaresi; Romano Zannoli; Stefano Brusori; Franco d'Ovidio; Laura Braccaioli
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Multiple swallows and piecemeal deglutition; observations from normal adults and patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  J Dziadziola; S Hamlet; G Michou; L Jones
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Videomanometric aspects of pharyngeal constrictor activity.

Authors:  R Olsson; O Kjellin; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  The incidence of gastro-esophageal disease for the patients with typical chest pain and a normal coronary angiogram.

Authors:  Chang-Wook Nam; Kee-Sik Kim; Young-Soo Lee; Sang-Hoon Lee; Seong-Wook Han; Seung-Ho Hur; Yoon-Nyun Kim; Kwon-Bae Kim; Byoung-Kuk Jang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  A prospective study of oesophageal function in patients with normal coronary angiograms and controls with angina.

Authors:  R A Cooke; A Anggiansah; J B Chambers; W J Owen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Transition from nutcracker esophagus to achalasia.

Authors:  A Anggiansah; N F Bright; M McCullagh; W J Owen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Swallowing performance in patients with vocal fold motion impairment.

Authors:  J A Wilson; A Pryde; A White; L Maher; A G Maran
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Are manometric parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx affected by age and gender?

Authors:  Margot A van Herwaarden; Phil O Katz; R Matthew Gideon; Jeff Barrett; June A Castell; S Achem; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 10.  Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.