Literature DB >> 12452394

Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function.

P Alonso1, E Estévez, C Aba, B González-Conde, J Yáñez, J L Vázquez-Iglesias.   

Abstract

Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, length of sphincter, and contraction of the crural diaphragm are determinants of esophageal function. Mean pressure manometrics in modified rapid pull-through reflects these three factors. Reproducibility and interobserver variability were studied to assess this method's efficacy and were compared with the maximum expiratory pressure in station pull-through in 44 individuals divided into three groups: achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux, and healthy volunteers. Mean pressure in rapid pull-through showed high reproducibility, no significant differences (14.4 +/- 8.4 vs 12.6 +/- 8.2 mm Hg) between two measurements, and a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.9). Interobserver variability was lower than that seen for maximum expiratory pressure (P < 0.001). Mean pressure was lower than maximum expiratory pressure in patients with achalasia (21.1 +/- 7 vs 30.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg). Both methods showed identical sensitivity to establish a hypotensive sphincter in patients with reflux (73%). We think that mean pressure obtained by rapid pull-through is a good methodology to assess lower esophageal sphincter competence. It is rapid, simple, shows good reproducibility and low interobserver variability, and is clinically valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12452394     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020576529685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in healthy subjects and gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  G J Wetscher; R A Hinder; G Perdikis; T Wieschemeier; R Stalzer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Mechanical properties of isolated human esophageal smooth muscle.

Authors:  A Tøttrup; A Forman; N Uldbjerg; P Funch-Jensen; K E Andersson
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-03

3.  Role of the diaphragm in the genesis of lower esophageal sphincter pressure in the cat.

Authors:  J T Boyle; S M Altschuler; T E Nixon; D N Tuchman; A I Pack; S Cohen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Interaction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length of sphincter in the abdomen as determinants of gastroesophageal competence.

Authors:  G C O'Sullivan; T R DeMeester; B E Joelsson; R B Smith; R R Blough; L F Johnson; D B Skinner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects.

Authors:  J Dent; W J Dodds; R H Friedman; T Sekiguchi; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer; D J Petrie
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Comparison of lower esophageal sphincter manometrics and gastroesophageal reflux measured by 24-hour pH recording.

Authors:  B B Kraus; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Effect of crural myotomy on the incidence and mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in cats.

Authors:  R K Mittal; B Sivri; B D Schirmer; K J Heine
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  An experience with polyethylene balloons for pneumatic dilation in achalasia.

Authors:  M D Gelfand; R A Kozarek
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Determinants of gastroesophageal junction incompetence: hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter, or both?

Authors:  S Sloan; A W Rademaker; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Manometric asymmetry of the lower-esophageal high-pressure zone.

Authors:  C S Winans
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.