Literature DB >> 16913437

The incidence of gastro-esophageal disease for the patients with typical chest pain and a normal coronary angiogram.

Chang-Wook Nam1, Kee-Sik Kim, Young-Soo Lee, Sang-Hoon Lee, Seong-Wook Han, Seung-Ho Hur, Yoon-Nyun Kim, Kwon-Bae Kim, Byoung-Kuk Jang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although patients may present with typical chest pain and exhibit ischemic changes on the cardiac stress test, they are frequently found to have a normal coronary angiogram. Thus, we wanted to determine which procedures should be performed in order to make an adequate diagnosis of the cause of chest pain.
METHODS: 121 patients (males: 42, 34.7%) who had a normal coronary angiogram with typical chest pain were included in this study. All the patients underwent upper endoscopy, Bernstein's test and esophageal manometry.
RESULTS: Among the 121 patients, clinically stable angina was noted in 107 (88.4%). Stress testing was done in 82 (67.8%); it was positive in 52 (63.4%). Endoscopic findings were erosive gastritis in 18 (14.8%), gastric ulcer in 4 (3.3%), duodenal ulcer in 5 (4.1%), and reflux esophagitis in 16 (13.2%). Positive results were observed on Berstein's test for 68 patients (56.2%); 59 (86.8%) of them had non-erosive reflux disease. On the esophageal manometry, 35 (28.9%) of these patients had motility disorders. Nutcracker esophagus was observed in 27 patients (22.3%), nonspecific esophageal motility disorder was observed in 5 (4.1%), and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter was observed in 3 (2.5%). Among the 52 patients with positive cardiac stress testing and a negative coronary angiogram (this clinically corresponded to microvascular angina), 46 patients (85.1%) showed abnormal findings on the gastro-esophageal studies.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 85.1% of the patients with microvascular angina revealed positive results of gastric or esophageal disease. In spite of any existing evidence of microvascular angina or cardiac syndrome X, it would be more advisable to perform gastro-esophageal studies to adequately manage chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16913437      PMCID: PMC3890743          DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2006.21.2.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Intern Med        ISSN: 1226-3303            Impact factor:   2.884


  10 in total

1.  Non-cardiac chest pain: squeezing the life out of the Australian healthcare system?

Authors:  G D Eslick; N J Talley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 2.  Are oesophageal disorders a common cause of chest pain despite normal coronary anatomy?

Authors:  E B Wu; R Cooke; A Anggiansah; W Owen; J B Chambers
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2000-08

3.  Prevalence and recognition of panic states in STARNET patients presenting with chest pain.

Authors:  D A Katerndahl; C Trammell
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Pathophysiology and management of patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms (cardiac syndrome X).

Authors:  Juan Carlos Kaski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  A clinical test for esophagitis.

Authors:  L M BERNSTEIN; L A BAKER
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1958-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Chest pain with normal coronary anatomy: further out of the closet.

Authors:  J B Chambers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1991

7.  Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects.

Authors:  J A Wilson; A Pryde; A Cecilia; C C Macintyre; R C Heading
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  "Microvascular angina" as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  R O Cannon; S E Epstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification.

Authors:  L R Lundell; J Dent; J R Bennett; A L Blum; D Armstrong; J P Galmiche; F Johnson; M Hongo; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  J C Kaski; G M Rosano; P Collins; P Nihoyannopoulos; A Maseri; P A Poole-Wilson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Definitions and incidence of cardiac syndrome X: review and analysis of clinical data.

Authors:  I A C Vermeltfoort; P G H M Raijmakers; I I Riphagen; D A M Odekerken; A F M Kuijper; A Zwijnenburg; G J J Teule
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.