Literature DB >> 8721063

Videomanometric aspects of pharyngeal constrictor activity.

R Olsson1, O Kjellin, O Ekberg.   

Abstract

Pressure changes were registered with videomanometry (simultaneous manometry and barium swallow) in the pharynx and in the pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) during swallowing. A considerable longitudinal asymmetry was found. Peak pressure was highest in the PES, lower in the inferior constrictor area, and lowest at the level of the tongue base. The rate of pressure rise was highest at the level of the PES. The speed of propagation of the contraction wave was 13 (+/- 2) cm/sec. There was no correlation between the measured variables (i.e., peak pressure, rate of pressure rise, and speed of contracting wave). Our findings can partly be explained by different mechanical constraints at different levels of the pharynx but may also reflect the organization of neural control of swallowing in the brainstem. Knowledge of transducer position and orientation is essential for the evaluation of pharyngeal pressure during swallowing. Such knowledge is best achieved by performing manometry simultaneously with fluoroscopy, i.e., videomanometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8721063     DOI: 10.1007/BF00417894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  17 in total

1.  Timing of videofluoroscopic, manometric events, and bolus transit during the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  I J Cook; W J Dodds; R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; R Shaker; W J Hogan
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Pharyngeal clearance during swallowing: a combined manometric and videofluoroscopic study.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; J A Logemann; S Lin; G A Ergun
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Interpretation of intraluminal manometric measurements in terms of swallowing mechanics.

Authors:  J G Brasseur; W J Dodds
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans.

Authors:  J A Castell; C B Dalton; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-02

5.  Speed of peristalsis in pharyngeal constrictor musculature: correlation to age.

Authors:  P S Borgström; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Control of the central swallowing program by inputs from the peripheral receptors. A review.

Authors:  A Jean
Journal:  J Auton Nerv Syst       Date:  1984 May-Jun

7.  Simultaneous videoradiography and computerized pharyngeal manometry--videomanometry.

Authors:  R Olsson; H Nilsson; O Ekberg
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; W J Dodds; P J Kahrilas; J G Brasseur; I J Cook; I M Lang
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-05

Review 9.  Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Medullary control of the pontine swallowing neurones in sheep.

Authors:  M Amri; A Car; A Jean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

1.  Timing of pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressures as a function of normal and effortful swallowing in young healthy adults.

Authors:  Susan G Hiss; Maggie Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Function of the inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle.

Authors:  M Yamaoka; K Furusawa
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Pharyngeal swallowing pressures in the base-of-tongue and hypopharynx regions identified with three-dimensional manometry.

Authors:  Sarah P Rosen; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  The influence of orolingual pressure on the timing of pharyngeal pressure events.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Maggie Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Automated analysis of pharyngeal pressure data obtained with high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Jason D Mielens; Matthew R Hoffman; Michelle R Ciucci; Jack J Jiang; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Endoscopic CO2 laser-assisted surgery for cricopharyngeal dysfunction.

Authors:  Georges Lawson; Marc Remacle; Jacques Jamart; Jérôme Keghian
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Long-term results of external upper esophageal sphincter myotomy for oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Authors:  Martijn P Kos; Eric F David; Elly C Klinkenberg-Knol; Hans F Mahieu
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  The Reliability of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry with Impedance for Derivation of Measures of Swallowing Function in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Johanna Savilampi; Karmen Kokkinn; Mistyka Schar; Kristin Lamvik; Sebastian Doeltgen; Charles Cock
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-14

Review 9.  Simultaneous X-ray Video-Fluoroscopy and Pulsed Ultrasound Velocimetry Analyses of the Pharyngeal Phase of Swallowing of Boluses with Different Rheological Properties.

Authors:  Waqas M Qazi; Olle Ekberg; Johan Wiklund; Rashid Mansoor; Mats Stading
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.438

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.