Literature DB >> 8359050

Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

J A Castell1, D O Castell.   

Abstract

There has been renewed interest in the use of manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment in the investigation of pharyngeal dysphagia. Advances in technology have alleviated previous difficulties presented by factors such as the rapid response rate of the striated muscle and asymmetry of the upper esophageal sphincter. Close attention to technique can overcome difficulties with movement artifacts encountered during deglutition. Manometry is being used to study normal swallow function and the effects of physiologic changes. There are also increasing numbers of reports in the literature of manometric studies in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. This technique provides information on pressure changes and augments that information obtained from a barium swallow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8359050     DOI: 10.1007/bf01354550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  31 in total

1.  Effects of body position and bolus consistency on the manometric parameters and coordination of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx.

Authors:  J A Castell; C B Dalton; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording.

Authors:  S B Lydon; W J Dodds; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-10

3.  Upper esophageal sphincter tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation.

Authors:  I J Cook; J Dent; S M Collins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Effect of sleep, spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux, and a meal on upper esophageal sphincter pressure in normal human volunteers.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; W J Dodds; J Dent; B Haeberle; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Measurement of pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter. The influence of catheter diameter.

Authors:  M D Kaye; J P Showalter
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1974-09

6.  The pharyngoesophageal closure mechanism: a manometric study.

Authors:  C S Winans
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; W J Dodds; J Dent; J A Logemann; R Shaker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Manometry of the normal upper esophageal sphincter and its alterations in laryngectomy.

Authors:  R W Welch; K Luckmann; P M Ricks; S T Drake; G A Gates
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Abnormal upper esophageal sphincter function in achalasia.

Authors:  R S Dudnick; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's) diverticulum: a reappraisal.

Authors:  T E Knuff; S B Benjamin; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) using simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) and manometry.

Authors:  Larry S Miller; Qing Dai; Brett A Sweitzer; Vinod Thangada; Joseph K Kim; Beje Thomas; Henry Parkman; Ahmed M Soliman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with head turn and chin tuck.

Authors:  Timothy M McCulloch; Matthew R Hoffman; Michelle R Ciucci
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): proposal for informed consent.

Authors:  A Nacci; F Ursino; R La Vela; F Matteucci; V Mallardi; B Fattori
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  Pharyngeal pressures during swallowing within and across three sessions: within-subject variance and order effects.

Authors:  Phoebe R Macrae; Daniel J Myall; Richard D Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Videomanometric aspects of pharyngeal constrictor activity.

Authors:  R Olsson; O Kjellin; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Comparison of unidirectional and circumferential manometric measures within the pharyngoesophageal segment: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Esther Guiu Hernandez; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Richard Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Simultaneous videoradiography and pharyngeal solid state manometry (videomanometry) in 25 nondysphagic volunteers.

Authors:  R Olsson; H Nilsson; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Comment on Cook: cricopharyngeal function and dysfunction.

Authors:  W Brühlmann
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Clinical applications of oro-pharyngo-oesophageal scintigraphy in the study of dysphagia.

Authors:  B Fattori; M Grosso; F Ursino; F Matteucci; V Mancini; E Rizza; V Mattone; G Mariani; A Nacci
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Are manometric parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx affected by age and gender?

Authors:  Margot A van Herwaarden; Phil O Katz; R Matthew Gideon; Jeff Barrett; June A Castell; S Achem; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.