Literature DB >> 3371625

Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition.

P J Kahrilas1, W J Dodds, J Dent, J A Logemann, R Shaker.   

Abstract

Upper esophageal sphincter function was investigated during swallows of graded volumes in 8 normal volunteers. Concurrent recordings of video-fluoroscopic and manometric studies were obtained and correlated with each other by means of a videotimer. Maximal upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure was typically located 1.5 cm distal to the air-tissue interface between the hypopharynx and the proximal margin of the sphincter. The region in which UES pressure was greater than or equal to 50% maximal averaged 1.0 cm in length. Thus, the physiologic high-pressure zone of the UES corresponds in size and location to that of the cricopharyngeus muscle. Fluoroscopic analysis of sphincter movement indicated that the sphincter high-pressure zone moved 2.0-2.5 cm orally during swallowing and that the magnitude of the orad movement was directly related to the volume of barium swallowed. The maximal anterior-posterior diameter of sphincter opening during a swallow ranged from 0.9 to 1.5 cm and was also directly related to the volume swallowed. The intervals of UES opening and relaxation increased significantly with increasing bolus volume; the duration of UES relaxation ranged from a mean of 0.37 s for dry swallows to 0.65 s for 20-ml swallows. Thus, the dynamics of UES function during deglutition are dependent upon the volume of the swallowed bolus. Larger bolus volumes are accommodated by both an increased diameter of sphincter opening and by prolongation of the interval of sphincter relaxation. Analysis of the timing of other reference points within the pharyngeal swallow sequence indicated that as the manometric interval of UES relaxation increased, the period of laryngeal elevation was prolonged, the UES relaxed earlier and contracted later, and the interval between the onset of laryngeal elevation and hypopharyngeal contraction increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3371625     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90290-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  93 in total

Review 1.  An overview of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  I M Lang; R Shaker
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-06

2.  The Feasibility of Establishing Agreement Between Laboratories for Measures of Oropharyngeal Structural Movements.

Authors:  Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Mark Kern; Reza Shaker; Jeri A Logemann
Journal:  J Med Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2009-03

3.  Pharyngoesophageal manometry with an original balloon sensor probe for the study of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Sandro Mattioli; Marialuisa Lugaresi; Romano Zannoli; Stefano Brusori; Franco d'Ovidio; Laura Braccaioli
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Modulation of voluntary swallowing by visual inputs in humans.

Authors:  Keiko Maeda; Takashi Ono; Ryo Otsuka; Yasuo Ishiwata; Takayuki Kuroda; Kimie Ohyama
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Evaluation of normal deglutition with the help of rectified surface electromyography records.

Authors:  Michael Vaiman; Ephraim Eviatar; Samuel Segal
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Periventricular white matter changes and oropharyngeal swallowing in normal individuals.

Authors:  R Levine; J A Robbins; A Maser
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Food intake by maneuver; an extreme compensation for impaired swallowing.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; J A Logemann; P Gibbons
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Effects of body position and bolus consistency on the manometric parameters and coordination of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx.

Authors:  J A Castell; C B Dalton; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Factors affecting ability to resume oral nutrition in the oropharyngeal dysphagic individual.

Authors:  J A Logemann
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Proximal sensor data from routine dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is often inaccurate.

Authors:  Matt McCollough; Abdul Jabbar; Robert Cacchione; Jeff W Allen; Steve Harrell; John M Wo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.