Literature DB >> 19062865

Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.

Michael A Stone1, Christian Füllgrabe, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

In cochlear implants, or vocoder simulations of cochlear implants, the transmission of envelope cues at high rates (related to voice fundamental frequency, f0) may be limited by the widths of the filters used to form the channels and/or by the cutoff frequency, f(lp), of the low-pass filters used for envelope extraction. The effect of varying f(lp) in tone and noise vocoders was investigated for channel numbers, N, from 6 to 18. As N increased, the widths of the channels decreased. The value of f(lp) was 45 Hz (envelope or "E" filter), or 180 Hz (pitch or "P" filter). The following combinations of cutoff frequencies were used for channels below and above 1500 Hz, respectively: EE, PE, EP, and PP. Results from a competing-talker task showed that the tone vocoder led to better intelligibility than the noise vocoder. The PP condition led to the best intelligibility and the EE condition to the worst. For N=6, intelligibility was better for condition PE than for condition EP. For N=18, the reverse was true. The results indicate that the channel bandwidths can compromise the transmission of f0-related envelope information, and suggest that vocoder simulations of cochlear-implant processing have limitations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062865     DOI: 10.1121/1.2968678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Shifting fundamental frequency in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Nicole M Scherrer; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xing Li; Kaibao Nie; Nikita S Imennov; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein; Les E Atlas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22

9.  Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Alan Wiinberg; Johannes Zaar; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Erin P Walter; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.