Literature DB >> 33003879

Spectro-temporal glimpsing of speech in noise: Regularity and coherence of masking patterns reduces uncertainty and increases intelligibility.

Daniel Fogerty1, Victoria A Sevich2, Eric W Healy2.   

Abstract

Adverse listening conditions involve glimpses of spectro-temporal speech information. This study investigated if the acoustic organization of the spectro-temporal masking pattern affects speech glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. The regularity and coherence of the masking pattern was varied. Regularity was reduced by randomizing the spectral or temporal gating of the masking noise. Coherence involved the spectral alignment of frequency bands across time or the temporal alignment of gated onsets/offsets across frequency bands. Experiment 1 investigated the effect of spectral or temporal coherence. Experiment 2 investigated independent and combined factors of regularity and coherence. Performance was best in spectro-temporally modulated noise having larger glimpses. Generally, performance also improved as the regularity and coherence of masker fluctuations increased, with regularity having a stronger effect than coherence. An acoustic glimpsing model suggested that the effect of regularity (but not coherence) could be partially attributed to the availability of glimpses retained after energetic masking. Performance tended to be better with maskers that were spectrally coherent as compared to temporally coherent. Overall, performance was best when the spectro-temporal masking pattern imposed even spectral sampling and minimal temporal uncertainty, indicating that listeners use reliable masking patterns to aid in spectro-temporal speech glimpsing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33003879      PMCID: PMC7500957          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  58 in total

1.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; John Deeks; Genevieve Aikman; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Sources of variability in consonant perception of normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Johannes Zaar; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Coherence masking protection in brief noise complexes: effects of temporal patterns.

Authors:  P C Gordon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral redundancy: intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits.

Authors:  R M Warren; K R Riener; J A Bashford; B S Brubaker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

8.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  M Nilsson; S D Soli; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Cheryl L Eiler; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Auditory grouping is necessary to understand interrupted mosaic speech stimuli.

Authors:  Kazuo Ueda; Hiroshige Takeichi; Kohei Wakamiya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.