Literature DB >> 27911353

Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.

Yunzhi Wang1, Faranak Aghaei1, Ali Zarafshani1, Yuchen Qiu1, Wei Qian2,3, Bin Zheng1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a new computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme that computes visually sensitive image features routinely used by radiologists to develop a machine learning classifier and distinguish between the malignant and benign breast masses detected from digital mammograms.
METHODS: An image dataset including 301 breast masses was retrospectively selected. From each segmented mass region, we computed image features that mimic five categories of visually sensitive features routinely used by radiologists in reading mammograms. We then selected five optimal features in the five feature categories and applied logistic regression models for classification. A new CAD interface was also designed to show lesion segmentation, computed feature values and classification score.
RESULTS: Areas under ROC curves (AUC) were 0.786±0.026 and 0.758±0.027 when to classify mass regions depicting on two view images, respectively. By fusing classification scores computed from two regions, AUC increased to 0.806±0.025.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a new approach to develop CAD scheme based on 5 visually sensitive image features. Combining with a "visual aid" interface, CAD results may be much more easily explainable to the observers and increase their confidence to consider CAD generated classification results than using other conventional CAD approaches, which involve many complicated and visually insensitive texture features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); classification of mammographic masses; quantification of visually sensitive image features; quantitative image feature selection in CAD

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27911353      PMCID: PMC5291799          DOI: 10.3233/XST-16212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol        ISSN: 0895-3996            Impact factor:   1.535


  31 in total

1.  Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness.

Authors:  Z Huo; M L Giger; C J Vyborny; D E Wolverton; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.

Authors:  L Hadjiiski; B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M Helvie
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering.

Authors:  B Zheng; Y H Chang; W F Good; D Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.

Authors:  C Varela; S Timp; N Karssemeijer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  On the reporting of mass contrast in CAD research.

Authors:  B Zheng; Y H Chang; D Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Fusion of Quantitative Image and Genomic Biomarkers to Improve Prognosis Assessment of Early Stage Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nastaran Emaminejad; Wei Qian; Yubao Guan; Maxine Tan; Yuchen Qiu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms.

Authors:  G M te Brake; N Karssemeijer; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Volkert Dirk Siersma
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.

Authors:  Sudhir Varma; Richard Simon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  11 in total

1.  Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuxin Chen; Abolfazl Zargari; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Wei Liu; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Abolfazl Zargari Khuzani; Alan B Hollingsworth; Gopichandh Danala; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Yuchen Qiu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A Comparison of Computer-Aided Diagnosis Schemes Optimized Using Radiomics and Deep Transfer Learning Methods.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran Maryada; Warid Islam; Rowzat Faiz; Meredith Jones; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  A new approach to develop computer-aided diagnosis scheme of breast mass classification using deep learning technology.

Authors:  Yuchen Qiu; Shiju Yan; Rohith Reddy Gundreddy; Yunzhi Wang; Samuel Cheng; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.535

6.  Prediction of chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer patients using a new clustered quantitative image marker.

Authors:  Abolfazl Zargari; Yue Du; Morteza Heidari; Theresa C Thai; Camille C Gunderson; Kathleen Moore; Robert S Mannel; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Bhavika Patel; Faranak Aghaei; Morteza Heidari; Jing Li; Teresa Wu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Comparison of segmentation-free and segmentation-dependent computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses on a public mammography dataset.

Authors:  Rebecca Sawyer Lee; Jared A Dunnmon; Ann He; Siyi Tang; Christopher Ré; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Applying a Random Projection Algorithm to Optimize Machine Learning Model for Breast Lesion Classification.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Sivaramakrishnan Lakshmivarahan; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran R Maryada; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.756

10.  Developing global image feature analysis models to predict cancer risk and prognosis.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu; Faranak Aghaei; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Morteza Heidari; Gopichandh Danala
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2019-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.