Literature DB >> 28436410

A new approach to develop computer-aided diagnosis scheme of breast mass classification using deep learning technology.

Yuchen Qiu1, Shiju Yan2, Rohith Reddy Gundreddy1, Yunzhi Wang1, Samuel Cheng3, Hong Liu1, Bin Zheng1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and test a deep learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme of mammograms for classifying between malignant and benign masses.
METHODS: An image dataset involving 560 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from digital mammograms was used. After down-sampling each ROI from 512×512 to 64×64 pixel size, we applied an 8 layer deep learning network that involves 3 pairs of convolution-max-pooling layers for automatic feature extraction and a multiple layer perceptron (MLP) classifier for feature categorization to process ROIs. The 3 pairs of convolution layers contain 20, 10, and 5 feature maps, respectively. Each convolution layer is connected with a max-pooling layer to improve the feature robustness. The output of the sixth layer is fully connected with a MLP classifier, which is composed of one hidden layer and one logistic regression layer. The network then generates a classification score to predict the likelihood of ROI depicting a malignant mass. A four-fold cross validation method was applied to train and test this deep learning network.
RESULTS: The results revealed that this CAD scheme yields an area under the receiver operation characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.696±0.044, 0.802±0.037, 0.836±0.036, and 0.822±0.035 for fold 1 to 4 testing datasets, respectively. The overall AUC of the entire dataset is 0.790±0.019.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a deep learning based CAD scheme to classify between malignant and benign breast masses without a lesion segmentation, image feature computation and selection process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer aided diagnosis (CAD); breast mass classification; convolution neuron networks; deep learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28436410      PMCID: PMC5647205          DOI: 10.3233/XST-16226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol        ISSN: 0895-3996            Impact factor:   1.535


  26 in total

1.  Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Wang; Sang Cheol Park; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; Rene Vargas-Voracek; David M Catarious; Carey E Floyd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Deep convolutional neural networks for multi-modality isointense infant brain image segmentation.

Authors:  Wenlu Zhang; Rongjian Li; Houtao Deng; Li Wang; Weili Lin; Shuiwang Ji; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts.

Authors:  Rianne Hupse; Maurice Samulski; Marc B Lobbes; Ritse M Mann; Roel Mus; Gerard J den Heeten; David Beijerinck; Ruud M Pijnappel; Carla Boetes; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  CADe for early detection of breast cancer-current status and why we need to continue to explore new approaches.

Authors:  Robert M Nishikawa; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  DeepID-Net: Deformable Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Object Detection.

Authors:  Wanli Ouyang; Xingyu Zeng; Xiaogang Wang; Shi Qiu; Ping Luo; Yonglong Tian; Hongsheng Li; Shuo Yang; Zhe Wang; Hongyang Li; Chen Change Loy; Kun Wang; Junjie Yan; Xiaoou Tang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Faranak Aghaei; Yunzhi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Volkert Dirk Siersma
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Feature selection for the automated detection of metaphase chromosomes: performance comparison using a receiver operating characteristic method.

Authors:  Yuchen Qiu; Jie Song; Xianglan Lu; Yuhua Li; Bin Zheng; Shibo Li; Hong Liu
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.916

View more
  13 in total

1.  Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuxin Chen; Abolfazl Zargari; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Wei Liu; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Should We Ignore, Follow, or Biopsy? Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support on Breast Ultrasound Lesion Assessment.

Authors:  Victoria L Mango; Mary Sun; Ralph T Wynn; Richard Ha
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Improving mammography lesion classification by optimal fusion of handcrafted and deep transfer learning features.

Authors:  Meredith A Jones; Rowzat Faiz; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  COVID-19 diagnosis system by deep learning approaches.

Authors:  Hemanta Kumar Bhuyan; Chinmay Chakraborty; Yogesh Shelke; Subhendu Kumar Pani
Journal:  Expert Syst       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.812

6.  Artificial Intelligence in Imaging: The Radiologist's Role.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Bhavika Patel; Faranak Aghaei; Morteza Heidari; Jing Li; Teresa Wu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Applying a Random Projection Algorithm to Optimize Machine Learning Model for Breast Lesion Classification.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Sivaramakrishnan Lakshmivarahan; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran R Maryada; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 9.  A Comprehensive Survey on Deep-Learning-Based Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Muhammad Firoz Mridha; Md Abdul Hamid; Muhammad Mostafa Monowar; Ashfia Jannat Keya; Abu Quwsar Ohi; Md Rashedul Islam; Jong-Myon Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Deep learning can be used to train naïve, nonprofessional observers to detect diagnostic visual patterns of certain cancers in mammograms: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Jay Hegdé
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.