Literature DB >> 16394348

Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.

C Varela1, S Timp, N Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

We are developing a new method to characterize the margin of a mammographic mass lesion to improve the classification of benign and malignant masses. Towards this goal, we designed features that measure the degree of sharpness and microlobulation of mass margins. We calculated these features in a border region of the mass defined as a thin band along the mass contour. The importance of these features in the classification of benign and malignant masses was studied in relation to existing features used for mammographic mass detection. Features were divided into three groups, each representing a different mass segment: the interior region of a mass, the border and the outer area. The interior and the outer area of a mass were characterized using contrast and spiculation measures. Classification was done in two steps. First, features representing each of the three mass segments were merged into a neural network classifier resulting in a single regional classification score for each segment. Secondly, a classifier combined the three single scores into a final output to discriminate between benign and malignant lesions. We compared the classification performance of each regional classifier and the combined classifier on a data set of 1076 biopsy proved masses (590 malignant and 486 benign) from 481 women included in the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of the classifiers. The area under the ROC curve (A(z)) was 0.69 for the interior mass segment, 0.76 for the border segment and 0.75 for the outer mass segment. The performance of the combined classifier was 0.81 for image-based and 0.83 for case-based evaluation. These results show that the combination of information from different mass segments is an effective approach for computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses. An advantage of this approach is that it allows the assessment of the contribution of regions rather than individual features. Results suggest that the border and the outer areas contained the most valuable information for discrimination between benign and malignant masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16394348     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/2/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  New statistical learning theory paradigms adapted to breast cancer diagnosis/classification using image and non-image clinical data.

Authors:  Walker H Land; John J Heine; Tom Raway; Alda Mizaku; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Jack Y Yang; Mary Qu Yang
Journal:  Int J Funct Inform Personal Med       Date:  2008-01

Review 2.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Assessment of performance and reproducibility of applying a content-based image retrieval scheme for classification of breast lesions.

Authors:  Rohith Reddy Gundreddy; Maxine Tan; Yuchen Qiu; Samuel Cheng; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Needs assessment for next generation computer-aided mammography reference image databases and evaluation studies.

Authors:  Alexander Horsch; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Matthias Elter
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Samuel Cheng; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Probing model tumor interfacial properties using piezoelectric cantilevers.

Authors:  Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 9.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chintana Paramagul; Janet E Bailey; Alexis V Nees; Caroline E Blane; Dorit D Adler; Stephanie K Patterson; Katherine A Klein; Renee W Pinsky; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.