Literature DB >> 29748869

Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.

Gopichandh Danala1, Bhavika Patel2, Faranak Aghaei1, Morteza Heidari1, Jing Li3, Teresa Wu3, Bin Zheng4.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is a promising imaging modality in breast cancer diagnosis. This study aims to investigate how to optimally develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme of CEDM images to classify breast masses. A CEDM dataset of 111 patients was assembled, which includes 33 benign and 78 malignant cases. Each CEDM includes two types of images namely, low energy (LE) and dual-energy subtracted (DES) images. A CAD scheme was applied to segment mass regions depicting on LE and DES images separately. Optimal segmentation results generated from DES images were also mapped to LE images or vice versa. After computing image features, multilayer perceptron based machine learning classifiers that integrate with a correlation-based feature subset evaluator and leave-one-case-out cross-validation method were built to classify mass regions. When applying CAD to DES and LE images with original segmentation, areas under ROC curves (AUC) were 0.759 ± 0.053 and 0.753 ± 0.047, respectively. After mapping the mass regions optimally segmented on DES images to LE images, AUC significantly increased to 0.848 ± 0.038 (p < 0.01). Study demonstrated that DES images eliminated overlapping effect of dense breast tissue, which helps improve mass segmentation accuracy. The study demonstrated that applying a novel approach to optimally map mass region segmented from DES images to LE images enabled CAD to yield significantly improved performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer diagnosis; Classification of breast masses; Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM); Performance comparison; Segmentation of breast mass regions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29748869      PMCID: PMC6097613          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-2044-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  27 in total

1.  False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Benndorf; Matthias Dietzel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Ingo B Runnebaum; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Reduction of bias and variance for evaluation of computer-aided diagnostic schemes.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.

Authors:  Nevine H Eltonsy; Georgia D Tourassi; Adel S Elmaghraby
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Yvan Saeys; Iñaki Inza; Pedro Larrañaga
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; Sara Ranjbar; Teresa Wu; Barbara A Pockaj; Jing Li; Nan Zhang; Mark Lobbes; Bin Zhang; J Ross Mitchell
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  A novel computer-aided diagnosis system for breast MRI based on feature selection and ensemble learning.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Zhe Li; Jinghui Chu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Faranak Aghaei; Yunzhi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Volkert Dirk Siersma
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  20 in total

1.  Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radiomics Analysis for Noninvasive Breast Cancer Characterization: Initial Results.

Authors:  Maria Adele Marino; Katja Pinker; Doris Leithner; Janice Sung; Daly Avendano; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine Jochelson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuxin Chen; Abolfazl Zargari; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Wei Liu; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Incorporating the clinical and radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography to classify breast lesions: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Simin Wang; Yuqi Sun; Ning Mao; Shaofeng Duan; Qin Li; Ruimin Li; Tingting Jiang; Zhongyi Wang; Haizhu Xie; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-10

5.  Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junjie Liu; Jiangjie Lei; Yuhang Ou; Yilong Zhao; Xiaofeng Tuo; Baoming Zhang; Mingwang Shen
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 5.057

6.  Developing a new radiomics-based CT image marker to detect lymph node metastasis among cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Xuxin Chen; Wei Liu; Theresa C Thai; Tara Castellano; Camille C Gunderson; Kathleen Moore; Robert S Mannel; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.

Authors:  Marzieh Esmaeili; Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Azin Nahvijou; Keivan Maghooli
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2020-04-01

8.  Applying a random projection algorithm to optimize machine learning model for predicting peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients using CT images.

Authors:  Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Morteza Heidari; Gopichandh Danala; Sivaramakrishnan Lakshmivarahan; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Applying a Random Projection Algorithm to Optimize Machine Learning Model for Breast Lesion Classification.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Sivaramakrishnan Lakshmivarahan; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran R Maryada; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.756

10.  Diagnostic performance of perilesional radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Simin Wang; Yuqi Sun; Ruimin Li; Ning Mao; Qin Li; Tingting Jiang; Qianqian Chen; Shaofeng Duan; Haizhu Xie; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.