Literature DB >> 27908046

Band importance functions of listeners with cochlear implants using clinical maps.

Adam K Bosen1, Monita Chatterjee1.   

Abstract

Band importance functions estimate the relative contribution of individual acoustic frequency bands to speech intelligibility. Previous studies of band importance in listeners with cochlear implants have used experimental maps and direct stimulation. Here, band importance was estimated for clinical maps with acoustic stimulation. Listeners with cochlear implants had band importance functions that relied more heavily on lower frequencies and showed less cross-listener consistency than in listeners with normal hearing. The intersubject variability observed here indicates that averaging band importance functions across listeners with cochlear implants, as has been done in previous studies, may not be meaningful. Additionally, band importance functions of listeners with normal hearing for vocoded speech that either did or did not simulate spread of excitation were not different from one another, suggesting that additional factors beyond spread of excitation are necessary to account for changes in band importance in listeners with cochlear implants.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27908046      PMCID: PMC5392084          DOI: 10.1121/1.4967298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Channel weights for speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  M A Mehr; C W Turner; A Parkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral weighting strategies for sentences measured by a correlational method.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Use of a correlational method to estimate a listener's weighting function for speech.

Authors:  K A Doherty; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: effects on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Quentin Mesnildrey; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  An alternative to the computational Speech Intelligibility Index estimates: direct measurement of rectangular passband intelligibilities.

Authors:  Richard M Warren; James A Bashford; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  12 in total

1.  Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yufan Du; Yi Shen; Xihong Wu; Jing Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech-material and talker effects in speech band importance.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy; Carla L Youngdahl; Tyson S Barrett; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Individualized frequency importance functions for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Adam K Bosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth.

Authors:  Kristen L D'Onofrio; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Alan W Archer-Boyd; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An Analysis of Individual Differences in Recognizing Monosyllabic Words Under the Speech Intelligibility Index Framework.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.