Literature DB >> 33784471

Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth.

Kristen L D'Onofrio1, René H Gifford1.   

Abstract

Purpose The challenges associated with cochlear implant (CI)-mediated listening are well documented; however, they can be mitigated through the provision of aided acoustic hearing in the contralateral ear-a configuration termed bimodal hearing. This study extends previous literature to examine the effect of acoustic bandwidth in the non-CI ear for music perception. The primary aim was to determine the minimum and optimum acoustic bandwidth necessary to obtain bimodal benefit for music perception and speech perception. Method Participants included 12 adult bimodal listeners and 12 adult control listeners with normal hearing. Music perception was assessed via measures of timbre perception and subjective sound quality of real-world music samples. Speech perception was assessed via monosyllabic word recognition in quiet. Acoustic stimuli were presented to the non-CI ear in the following filter conditions: < 125, < 250, < 500, and < 750 Hz, and wideband (full bandwidth). Results Generally, performance for all stimuli improved with increasing acoustic bandwidth; however, the bandwidth that is both minimally and optimally beneficial may be dependent upon stimulus type. On average, music sound quality required wideband amplification, whereas speech recognition with a male talker in quiet required a narrower acoustic bandwidth (< 250 Hz) for significant benefit. Still, average speech recognition performance continued to improve with increasing bandwidth. Conclusion Further research is warranted to examine optimal acoustic bandwidth for additional stimulus types; however, these findings indicate that wideband amplification is most appropriate for speech and music perception in individuals with bimodal hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33784471      PMCID: PMC8608177          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  51 in total

1.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Christopher Turner; Jacob Oleson; Xuyang Zhang; Bruce Gantz; Rebecca Froman; Carol Olszewski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

4.  Hybrid Music Perception Outcomes: Implications for Melody and Timbre Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Aaron J Parkinson; Jay T Rubinstein; Ward R Drennan; Christa Dodson; Kaibao Nie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Sex differences in emotional and psychophysiological responses to musical stimuli.

Authors:  Urs M Nater; Elvira Abbruzzese; Monika Krebs; Ulrike Ehlert
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Emotional Perception of Music in Children With Bimodal Fitting and Unilateral Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Sareh Shirvani; Zahra Jafari; Masoud Motasaddi Zarandi; Shohre Jalaie; Hamed Mohagheghi; Mohammad Reza Tale
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Effect of signal processing strategy and stimulation type on speech and auditory perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Susan M Reynolds; René H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Music Perception of Cochlear Implant Recipients with Implications for Music Instruction: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Feilin Hsiao; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  Update Univ S C Dep Music       Date:  2012-02-16

9.  Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.

Authors:  Alexis T Roy; Patpong Jiradejvong; Courtney Carver; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Effects of Low Frequency Residual Hearing on Music Perception and Psychoacoustic Abilities in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Mustafa Yüksel; Margaret A Meredith; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Use of Deep Learning-Based Gesture Interactive Robot in the Treatment of Autistic Children Under Music Perception Education.

Authors:  Yiyao Zhang; Chao Zhang; Lei Cheng; Mingwei Qi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Marina M Tawdrous; Kristen L D'Onofrio; René Gifford; Erin M Picou
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.