Literature DB >> 29604719

Speech-material and talker effects in speech band importance.

Sarah E Yoho1, Eric W Healy1, Carla L Youngdahl1, Tyson S Barrett2, Frédéric Apoux1.   

Abstract

Band-importance functions created using the compound method [Apoux and Healy (2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 1078-1087] provide more detail than those generated using the ANSI technique, necessitating and allowing a re-examination of the influences of speech material and talker on the shape of the band-importance function. More specifically, the detailed functions may reflect, to a larger extent, acoustic idiosyncrasies of the individual talker's voice. Twenty-one band functions were created using standard speech materials and recordings by different talkers. The band-importance functions representing the same speech-material type produced by different talkers were found to be more similar to one another than functions representing the same talker producing different speech-material types. Thus, the primary finding was the relative strength of a speech-material effect and weakness of a talker effect. This speech-material effect extended to other materials in the same broad class (different sentence corpora) despite considerable differences in the specific materials. Characteristics of individual talkers' voices were not readily apparent in the functions, and the talker effect was restricted to more global aspects of talker (i.e., gender). Finally, the use of multiple talkers diminished any residual effect of the talker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604719      PMCID: PMC5851785          DOI: 10.1121/1.5026787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences.

Authors:  T S Bell; D D Dirks; T D Trine
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-08

2.  Development of materials for speech audiometry.

Authors:  I J HIRSH; H DAVIS; S R SILVERMAN; E G REYNOLDS; E ELDERT; R W BENSON
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1952-09

3.  Talker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization.

Authors:  Ashley A Assgari; Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.

Authors:  G A MILLER; G A HEISE; W LICHTEN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-05

5.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Use of a correlational method to estimate a listener's weighting function for speech.

Authors:  K A Doherty; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustic and linguistic factors in the perception of bandpass-filtered speech.

Authors:  G S Stickney; P F Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A frequency importance function for continuous discourse.

Authors:  G A Studebaker; C V Pavlovic; R L Sherbecoe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yufan Du; Yi Shen; Xihong Wu; Jing Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The noise susceptibility of various speech bands.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Individualized frequency importance functions for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Adam K Bosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Serial Recall Predicts Vocoded Sentence Recognition Across Spectral Resolutions.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Michael F Barry
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.