Literature DB >> 2788957

Psychophysics of reading. VI--The role of contrast in low vision.

G S Rubin1, G E Legge.   

Abstract

The effect of contrast on reading performance was measured in 19 low-vision observers with a wide range of visual disorders and degrees of vision loss. The observers read text composed of 6 deg letters, ranging in contrast from 0.96 down to contrast threshold for reading. Reading performance was characterized by two parameters: peak reading rate is the reading rate at maximum contrast, and critical contrast is the contrast at which reading rate drops to half its maximum value. Peak reading rates were lower in observers with central field loss than in observers with intact central vision. In 16 of 19 cases, critical contrasts were higher for low-vision observers than for normal observers (averaging 3.9 times higher), indicating a decreased tolerance to contrast reduction. Values of critical contrast were closely linked to contrast sensitivity for letters (r = 0.87), but did not vary systematically with type of vision loss. Five observers read white-on-black text faster than black-on-white at both high and low contrasts. Four of the five had cloudy ocular media. We attribute this contrast polarity effect to abnormal light scatter in eyes with cloudy media. We examined the hypothesis that our low-vision observers' deviation from normal performance could be characterized (1) by a contrast scaling factor representing an attenuation of effective contrast and (2) that this scale factor could be identified with reduced contrast sensitivity. Such a description provided a good account for subjects with cloudy ocular media, where contrast attenuation results from intraocular light scatter. It provided a first order, but incomplete account for subjects with field loss where contrast attenuation is related to contrast sensitivity losses due to neural factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2788957     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90175-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

Review 1.  Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.

Authors:  Kavitha Thayaparan; Michael D Crossland; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Accessibility attributes of blood glucose meter and home blood pressure monitor displays for visually impaired persons.

Authors:  Morgan V Blubaugh; Mark M Uslan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

3.  Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Krishnan; Hope M Queener; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Assessment of the Apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid.

Authors:  E Morrice; A P Johnson; J-A Marinier; W Wittich
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Tablet and Smartphone Accessibility Features in the Low Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Danielle Irvine; Alex Zemke; Gregg Pusateri; Leah Gerlach; Rob Chun; Walter M Jay
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-11

7.  Slow Reading in Glaucoma: Is it due to the Shrinking Visual Span in Central Vision?

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; Christopher Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Adaptive changes in visual cortex following prolonged contrast reduction.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Fang Fang; Allen M Y Cheong; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  How normal eyes perform in reading low-contrast texts.

Authors:  Kyoko Fujita; Koichi Oda; Junko Watanabe; Mitsuko Yuzawa
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Results from the Radiation Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (RAD-) Study.

Authors:  Caren Bellmann; Kristina Unnebrink; Gary S Rubin; Daniel Miller; Frank G Holz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.