Literature DB >> 19271930

Adaptive changes in visual cortex following prolonged contrast reduction.

MiYoung Kwon1, Gordon E Legge, Fang Fang, Allen M Y Cheong, Sheng He.   

Abstract

How does prolonged reduction in retinal-image contrast affect visual-contrast coding? Recent evidence indicates that some forms of long-term visual deprivation result in compensatory perceptual and neural changes in the adult visual pathway. It has not been established whether changes due to contrast adaptation are best characterized as "contrast gain" or "response gain." We present a theoretical rationale for predicting that adaptation to long-term contrast reduction should result in response gain. To test this hypothesis, normally sighted subjects adapted for four hours by viewing their environment through contrast-reducing goggles. During the adaptation period, the subjects went about their usual daily activities. Subjects' contrast-discrimination thresholds and fMRI BOLD responses in cortical areas V1 and V2 were obtained before and after adaptation. Following adaptation, we observed a significant decrease in contrast-discrimination thresholds, and significant increase in BOLD responses in V1 and V2. The observed interocular transfer of the adaptation effect suggests that the adaptation has a cortical origin. These results reveal a new kind of adaptability of the adult visual cortex, an adjustment in the gain of the contrast-response in the presence of a reduced range of stimulus contrasts, which is consistent with a response-gain mechanism. The adaptation appears to be compensatory, such that the precision of contrast coding is improved for low retinal-image contrasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271930      PMCID: PMC2758613          DOI: 10.1167/9.2.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Contrast adaptation may enhance contrast discrimination.

Authors:  Giulia Abbonizio; Keith Langley; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2002

3.  BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images.

Authors:  Cheryl A Olman; Kamil Ugurbil; Paul Schrater; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

Authors:  Barbara Zenger-Landolt; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Visual function before and after the removal of bilateral congenital cataracts in adulthood.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Harvey S Smallman; Peter Doyle; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection.

Authors:  J Nachmias; R V Sansbury
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels.

Authors:  M A Georgeson; G D Sullivan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Contrast perception above threshold is only minimally impaired in human amblyopia.

Authors:  R F Hess; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  30 in total

1.  Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Min Bao; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Sensitivity to gaze-contingent contrast increments in naturalistic movies: An exploratory report and model comparison.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Visualizing Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Katherine E M Tregillus
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

7.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceptual learning reconfigures the effects of visual adaptation.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Neil W Roach; Ben S Webb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Simulations of adaptation and color appearance in observers with varying spectral sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Igor Juricevic; Kyle C McDermott
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Individual and age-related variation in chromatic contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.