Literature DB >> 27928274

Tablet and Smartphone Accessibility Features in the Low Vision Rehabilitation.

Danielle Irvine1, Alex Zemke1, Gregg Pusateri2, Leah Gerlach2, Rob Chun3, Walter M Jay4.   

Abstract

Tablet and smartphone use is rapidly increasing in developed countries. With this upsurge in popularity, the devices themselves are becoming more user-friendly for all consumers, including the visually impaired. Traditionally, visually impaired patients have received optical rehabilitation in the forms of microscopes, stand magnifiers, handheld magnifiers, telemicroscopes, and electronic magnification such as closed circuit televisions (CCTVs). In addition to the optical and financial limitations of traditional devices, patients do not always view them as being socially acceptable. For this reason, devices are often underutilised by patients due to lack of use in public forums or when among peers. By incorporating smartphones and tablets into a patient's low vision rehabilitation, in addition to traditional devices, one provides versatile and mainstream options, which may also be less expensive. This article explains exactly what the accessibility features of tablets and smartphones are for the blind and visually impaired, how to access them, and provides an introduction on usage of the features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive technology; low vision; rehabilitation; visual impairment

Year:  2014        PMID: 27928274      PMCID: PMC5123149          DOI: 10.3109/01658107.2013.874448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroophthalmology        ISSN: 0165-8107


  9 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Efficiency in reading with closed-circuit television for low vision.

Authors:  J B Lowe; N Drasdo
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Abandonment of low-vision devices in an outpatient population.

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; K Bradley Kehler; Richard Jamara; Nicole Patterson; Denise Valenti; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Text accessibility by people with reduced contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael D Crossland; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Psychophysics of reading. VI--The role of contrast in low vision.

Authors:  G S Rubin; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Psychophysics of reading--V. The role of contrast in normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; G S Rubin; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Visual requirements for reading.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  A comparison of patient reading performance and preference: optical devices, handheld CCTV (Innoventions Magni-Cam), or stand-mounted CCTV (Optelec Clearview or TSI Genie).

Authors:  G L Goodrich; J Kirby
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2001-08

9.  Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin; Paul P Lee; Nicole Wasserman; Karen Searcey
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05
  9 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Electronic vision aids : New options for rehabilitation of the visually impaired].

Authors:  N Celik; K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  A review of computational approaches for evaluation of rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Yalin Liao; Aleksandar Vakanski; Min Xian; David Paul; Russell Baker
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Computer-Mediated Experiences of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Samantha R Paige; Michael Stellefson; Janice L Krieger; Julia M Alber
Journal:  Am J Health Educ       Date:  2019-02-26

4.  Effectiveness of the Apple iPad as a Spot-reading Magnifier.

Authors:  Walter Wittich; Jonathan Jarry; Elliott Morrice; Aaron Johnson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Smartphones-Based Assistive Technology: Accessibility Features and Apps for People with Visual Impairment, and its Usage, Challenges, and Usability Testing.

Authors:  Suraj Singh Senjam; Souvik Manna; Covadonga Bascaran
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-11-27

6.  Challenges and Enablers for Smartphone Use by Persons With Vision Loss During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Report of Two Case Studies.

Authors:  Suraj Singh Senjam; Susan A Primo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Online Survey of Digital Reading by Adults with Low Vision.

Authors:  Yueh-Hsun Wu; Christina Granquist; Rachel Gage; Michael D Crossland; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.106

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.