Literature DB >> 18369699

How normal eyes perform in reading low-contrast texts.

Kyoko Fujita1, Koichi Oda, Junko Watanabe, Mitsuko Yuzawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of normal eyes in reading low-contrast texts.
METHODS: We selected 14 subjects aged 20 to 31 years (mean, 23 +/- 3 years) with corrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better. The subjects were asked to read texts when the contrast between the characters and background was adjusted to 100%, 40%, 20%, and 10%. Using a computer-generated reading chart, reading acuity (RA), critical character size (CCS), and maximum reading speed (MRS) were assessed. The reading performance was compared at various contrast levels.
RESULTS: When the contrast between the characters and background was 100%, 40%, 20%, and 10%, the mean RA (logMAR) was -0.08 +/- 0.07, 0.03 +/- 0.09, 0.13 +/- 0.09, and 0.26 +/- 0.11, respectively; the mean CCS (logMAR) was respectively 0.10 +/- 0.09, 0.18 +/- 0.09, 0.29 +/- 0.14, and 0.41 +/- 0.10. The mean MRS (characters/min) was 379.2 +/- 41.9, 369.7 +/- 43.3, 369.2 +/- 60.2, and 343.7 +/- 67.0, respectively. In all subjects, a decrease in contrast was associated with an increase in RA and CCS, but the MRS was not affected.
CONCLUSIONS: In normal eyes, even when reading low-contrast texts, increasing the character size makes it possible to maintain the same MRS as when reading high-contrast texts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18369699     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-007-0494-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  6 in total

1.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling.

Authors:  I L Bailey; M A Bullimore; T W Raasch; H R Taylor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.

Authors:  S J Leat; G C Woo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective study.

Authors:  W Verdon; M Bullimore; R K Maloney
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-12

4.  Psychophysics of reading. VI--The role of contrast in low vision.

Authors:  G S Rubin; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Psychophysics of reading--V. The role of contrast in normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; G S Rubin; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D G Pelli; G S Rubin; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.