Literature DB >> 29959926

Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina.

Arun Kumar Krishnan1, Hope M Queener2, Scott B Stevenson2, Julia S Benoit3, Harold E Bedell2.   

Abstract

Observers with central field loss typically fixate within a non-foveal region called the preferred retinal locus, which can include localized sensitivity losses, or micro-scotomas (Krishnan and Bedell, 2018). In this study, we simulated micro-scotomas at the fovea and in the peripheral retina to assess their impact on reading speed. Ten younger (<36 years old) and 8 older (>50 years old) naïve observers with normal vision monocularly read high and/or low contrast sentences, presented at or above the critical print size for young observers at the fovea and at 5 and 10 deg in the inferior visual field. Reading material comprised MNREAD sentences and sentences taken from novels that were presented in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) format. Randomly distributed 13 × 13 arc min blocks corresponding to 0-78% of the text area (corresponding to ∼0-17 micro-scotomas/deg2) were set to the background luminance to simulate micro-scotomas. A staircase algorithm estimated maximum reading speed from the threshold exposure duration for each combination of retinal eccentricity, contrast and micro-scotoma density in both age groups. Log10(RSVP reading speed) decreased significantly with simulated micro-scotoma density and eccentricity. Across conditions, reading speed was slower with low-compared to high-contrast text and was faster in younger than older normal observers. For a given eccentricity and contrast, a higher density of random element losses maximally affected older observers with normal vision. These outcomes may explain some of the reading deficits observed in older observers with central field loss.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central vision loss; Random element loss; Rapid serial visual presentation; Reading; Simulated scotoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959926      PMCID: PMC7298809          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  63 in total

1.  The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Jörg Sommerhalder; Evelyne Oueghlani; Marc Bagnoud; Ute Leonards; Avinoam B Safran; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Use of multiple preferred retinal loci in Stargardt's disease during natural tasks: a case study.

Authors:  Brian Sullivan; Jelena Jovancevic-Misic; Mary Hayhoe; Gwen Sterns
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Associations Between Spatial and Temporal Contrast Sensitivity and Reading.

Authors:  Tamara Brussee; Thomas J T P van den Berg; Ruth M A van Nispen; Ger H M B van Rens
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Budd; R W Cummings
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Contrast discrimination in peripheral vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D Kersten
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Reading training with threshold stimuli in people with central vision loss: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Luminita Tarita-Nistor; Michael H Brent; Martin J Steinbach; Samuel N Markowitz; Esther G González
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Baseline MNREAD Measures for Normally Sighted Subjects From Childhood to Old Age.

Authors:  Aurélie Calabrèse; Allen M Y Cheong; Sing-Hang Cheung; Yingchen He; MiYoung Kwon; J Stephen Mansfield; Ahalya Subramanian; Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.