Literature DB >> 27836709

A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control.

Matthew D Weaver1, Wieske van Zoest2, Clayton Hickey2.   

Abstract

We used concurrent electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking to investigate the role of covert attentional mechanisms in the control of oculomotor behavior. Human participants made speeded saccades to targets that were presented alongside salient distractors. By subsequently sorting trials based on whether the distractor was strongly represented or suppressed by the visual system - as evident in the accuracy (Exp. 1) or quality of the saccade (Exp. 2) - we could characterize and contrast pre-saccadic neural activity as a function of whether oculomotor control was established. Results show that saccadic behavior is strongly linked to the operation of attentional mechanisms in visual cortex. In Experiment 1, accurate saccades were preceded by attentional selection of the target - indexed by a target-elicited N2pc component - and by attentional suppression of the distractor - indexed by early and late distractor-elicited distractor positivity (Pd) components. In Experiment 2, the strength of distractor suppression predicted the degree to which the path of slower saccades would deviate away from the distractor en route to the target. However, results also demonstrated clear dissociations of covert and overt selective control, with saccadic latency in particular showing no relationship to the latency of covert selective mechanisms. Eye movements could thus be initiated prior to the onset of attentional ERP components, resulting in stimulus-driven behaviour. Taken together, the results indicate that attentional mechanisms play a role in determining saccadic behavior, but that saccade timing is not contingent on the deployment of attention. This creates a temporal dependency, whereby attention fosters oculomotor control only when attentional mechanisms are given sufficient opportunity to impact stimuli representations before an eye movement is executed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Electroencephalography; Eye Movements; Oculomotor control; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836709     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  21 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

5.  Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Attentional avoidance of threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-11

8.  Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Christoph Huber-Huber; Matthew D Weaver; Clayton Hickey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

10.  Psychophysical dual-task setups do not measure pre-saccadic attention but saccade-related strengthening of sensory representations.

Authors:  Christoph Huber-Huber; Julia Steininger; Markus Grüner; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.