Literature DB >> 27817057

The Y chromosome as the most popular marker in genetic genealogy benefits interdisciplinary research.

Francesc Calafell1, Maarten H D Larmuseau2,3.   

Abstract

The Y chromosome is currently by far the most popular marker in genetic genealogy that combines genetic data and family history. This popularity is based on its haploid character and its close association with the patrilineage and paternal inherited surname. Other markers have not been found (yet) to overrule this status due to the low sensitivity and precision of autosomal DNA for genetic genealogical applications, given the vagaries of recombination, and the lower capacities of mitochondrial DNA combined with an in general much lower interest in maternal lineages. The current knowledge about the Y chromosome and the availability of markers with divergent mutation rates make it possible to answer questions on relatedness levels which differ in time depth; from the individual and familial level to the surnames, clan and population level. The use of the Y chromosome in genetic genealogy has led to applications in several well-established research disciplines; namely in, e.g., family history, demography, anthropology, forensic sciences, population genetics and sex chromosome evolution. The information obtained from analysing this chromosome is not only interesting for academic scientists but also for the huge and lively community of amateur genealogists and citizen-scientists, fascinated in analysing their own genealogy or surname. This popularity, however, has also some drawbacks, mainly for privacy reasons related to the DNA donor, his close family and far-related namesakes. In this review paper we argue why Y-chromosomal analysis and its genetic genealogical applications will still perform an important role in future interdisciplinary research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27817057     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-016-1740-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  114 in total

1.  Migration distance rather than migration rate explains genetic diversity in human patrilocal groups.

Authors:  Sarah J Marks; Hila Levy; Conrado Martinez-Cadenas; Francesco Montinaro; Cristian Capelli
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Inferring genetic ancestry: opportunities, challenges, and implications.

Authors:  Charmaine D Royal; John Novembre; Stephanie M Fullerton; David B Goldstein; Jeffrey C Long; Michael J Bamshad; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  From social to genetic structures in central Asia.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Chaix; Lluís Quintana-Murci; Tatyana Hegay; Michael F Hammer; Zahra Mobasher; Frédéric Austerlitz; Evelyne Heyer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Anonymity 2.0: direct-to-consumer genetic testing and donor conception.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Olivia Rusu; Wybo Dondorp; Guido De Wert; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Heidi Carmen Howard
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Population-Scale Sequencing Data Enable Precise Estimates of Y-STR Mutation Rates.

Authors:  Thomas Willems; Melissa Gymrek; G David Poznik; Chris Tyler-Smith; Yaniv Erlich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  The history of the Y chromosome in man.

Authors:  Jennifer F Hughes; David C Page
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Modelling the recent common ancestry of all living humans.

Authors:  Douglas L T Rohde; Steve Olson; Joseph T Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Genomic analysis of the blood attributed to Louis XVI (1754-1793), king of France.

Authors:  Iñigo Olalde; Federico Sánchez-Quinto; Debayan Datta; Urko M Marigorta; Charleston W K Chiang; Juan Antonio Rodríguez; Marcos Fernández-Callejo; Irene González; Magda Montfort; Laura Matas-Lalueza; Sergi Civit; Donata Luiselli; Philippe Charlier; Davide Pettener; Oscar Ramírez; Arcadi Navarro; Heinz Himmelbauer; Tomàs Marquès-Bonet; Carles Lalueza-Fox
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Surnames and Y-chromosomal markers reveal low relationships in Southern Spain.

Authors:  Rosario Calderón; Candela L Hernández; Pedro Cuesta; Jean Michel Dugoujon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Y-chromosome analysis in individuals bearing the Basarab name of the first dynasty of Wallachian kings.

Authors:  Begoña Martinez-Cruz; Mihai Ioana; Francesc Calafell; Lara R Arauna; Paula Sanz; Ramona Ionescu; Sandu Boengiu; Luba Kalaydjieva; Horolma Pamjav; Halyna Makukh; Theo Plantinga; Jos W M van der Meer; David Comas; Mihai G Netea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  A game of hide and seq: Identification of parallel Y-STR evolution in deep-rooting pedigrees.

Authors:  Sofie Claerhout; Michiel Van der Haegen; Lisa Vangeel; Maarten H D Larmuseau; Ronny Decorte
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Molecular genealogy of Tusi Lu's family reveals their paternal relationship with Jochi, Genghis Khan's eldest son.

Authors:  Shao-Qing Wen; Hong-Bing Yao; Pan-Xin Du; Lan-Hai Wei; Xin-Zhu Tong; Ling-Xiang Wang; Chuan-Chao Wang; Bo-Yan Zhou; Mei-Sen Shi; Maxat Zhabagin; Jiucun Wang; Dan Xu; Li Jin; Hui Li
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Prediction of Y haplogroup by polymerase chain reaction-reverse blot hybridization assay.

Authors:  Sehee Oh; Jungho Kim; Sunyoung Park; Seoyong Kim; Kyungmyung Lee; Yang-Han Lee; Si-Keun Lim; Hyeyoung Lee
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.839

Review 4.  Phylogeographic review of Y chromosome haplogroups in Europe.

Authors:  B Navarro-López; E Granizo-Rodríguez; L Palencia-Madrid; C Raffone; M Baeta; M M de Pancorbo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics.

Authors:  Nathalie Moray; Katherina E Pink; Pascal Borry; Maarten Hd Larmuseau
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Human Y-chromosome variation in the genome-sequencing era.

Authors:  Mark A Jobling; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Large-scale pedigree analysis highlights rapidly mutating Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats for differentiating patrilineal relatives and predicting their degrees of consanguinity.

Authors:  Arwin Ralf; Diego Montiel González; Dion Zandstra; Bram van Wersch; Nefeli Kousouri; Peter de Knijff; Atif Adnan; Sofie Claerhout; Mohsen Ghanbari; Maarten H D Larmuseau; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.881

8.  Deletions and duplications of 42 Y chromosomal short tandem repeats in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Hailun Nan; Weiwei Wu; Honglei Hao; Wenran Ren; Dejian Lu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Insights Into Forensic Features and Genetic Structures of Guangdong Maoming Han Based on 27 Y-STRs.

Authors:  Haoliang Fan; Qiqian Xie; Yanning Li; Lingxiang Wang; Shao-Qing Wen; Pingming Qiu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Next Generation Sequencing Plus (NGS+) with Y-chromosomal Markers for Forensic Pedigree Searches.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Qian; Jiayi Hou; Zheng Wang; Yi Ye; Min Lang; Tianzhen Gao; Jing Liu; Yiping Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.