Literature DB >> 28272533

Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics.

Nathalie Moray1,2, Katherina E Pink3,4, Pascal Borry1,5, Maarten Hd Larmuseau5,6.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) internet companies are selling widely advertised and highly popular genetic ancestry tests to the broad public. These tests are often classified as falling within the scope of so-called 'recreational genetics', but little is known about the impact of using these services. In this study, a particular focus is whether minors (and under what conditions) should be able to participate in the use of these DTC tests. Current ancestry tests are easily able to reveal whether participants are related and can, therefore, also reveal misattributed paternity, with implications for the minors and adults involved in the testing. We analysed the publicly available privacy policies and terms of services of 43 DTC genetic ancestry companies to assess whether minors are able to participate in testing DTC genetic ancestry, and also whether and how companies ethically account for the potential of paternity inference. Our results indicated that the majority of DTC genetic ancestry testing companies do not specifically address whether minors are able to participate in testing. Furthermore, the majority of the policies and terms of services fail to mention the vulnerability of minors and family members in receiving unexpected information, in particular, in relation to (misattributed) paternity. Therefore, recreational genetics carries both the risk of unintentionally revealing misidentified paternity, and also the risk that fathers will deliberately use these services to test their children's paternity without revealing their intentions to the mother or any other third party.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28272533      PMCID: PMC5477360          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  18 in total

1.  The changing face of "misidentified paternity".

Authors:  Dena S Davis
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Anonymity 2.0: direct-to-consumer genetic testing and donor conception.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Olivia Rusu; Wybo Dondorp; Guido De Wert; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Heidi Carmen Howard
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Cuckolded Fathers Rare in Human Populations.

Authors:  Maarten H D Larmuseau; Koen Matthijs; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Brianne E Kirkpatrick; Misha D Rashkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic testing: anonymity of sperm donors under threat.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Olivia Rusu; Heidi C Howard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Biohistorical materials and contemporary privacy concerns-the forensic case of King Albert I.

Authors:  Maarten H D Larmuseau; Bram Bekaert; Maarten Baumers; Tom Wenseleers; Dieter Deforce; Pascal Borry; Ronny Decorte
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 7.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Heidi C Howard; Karine Sénécal; Denise Avard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Recent advances of genetic ancestry testing in biomedical research and direct to consumer testing.

Authors:  M Via; E Ziv; E G Burchard
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a comprehensive view.

Authors:  Pascal Su
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-09-20
View more
  6 in total

1.  The Future of DTC Genomics and the Law.

Authors:  Henry T Greely
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Japan on the Determination of Blood Relationship via DNA Testing.

Authors:  Waki Toya
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2017-06-30

3.  Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions.

Authors:  Jane Tiller; Paul Lacaze
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-02-15

4.  Noninvasive Prenatal Paternity Testing with a Combination of Well-Established SNP and STR Markers Using Massively Parallel Sequencing.

Authors:  Xuefeng Shen; Ran Li; Haixia Li; Yu Gao; Hui Chen; Ning Qu; Dan Peng; Riga Wu; Hongyu Sun
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation.

Authors:  Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Carlos Calhaz-Jorge; Eline A F Dancet; Kersti Lundin; Mariana Martins; Kelly Tilleman; Petra Thorn; Nathalie Vermeulen; Lucy Frith
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-16

6.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.

Authors:  Ellen W Clayton; Colin M Halverson; Nila A Sathe; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.