Literature DB >> 27810758

Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Werner Brack1, Valeria Dulio2, Marlene Ågerstrand3, Ian Allan4, Rolf Altenburger5, Markus Brinkmann6, Dirk Bunke7, Robert M Burgess8, Ian Cousins3, Beate I Escher9, Félix J Hernández10, L Mark Hewitt11, Klára Hilscherová12, Juliane Hollender13, Henner Hollert6, Robert Kase14, Bernd Klauer15, Claudia Lindim3, David López Herráez15, Cécil Miège16, John Munthe17, Simon O'Toole18, Leo Posthuma19, Heinz Rüdel20, Ralf B Schäfer21, Manfred Sengl22, Foppe Smedes12, Dik van de Meent23, Paul J van den Brink24, Jos van Gils25, Annemarie P van Wezel26, A Dick Vethaak27, Etienne Vermeirssen13, Peter C von der Ohe28, Branislav Vrana12.   

Abstract

Water is a vital resource for natural ecosystems and human life, and assuring a high quality of water and protecting it from chemical contamination is a major societal goal in the European Union. The Water Framework Directive (WFD) and its daughter directives are the major body of legislation for the protection and sustainable use of European freshwater resources. The practical implementation of the WFD with regard to chemical pollution has faced some challenges. In support of the upcoming WFD review in 2019 the research project SOLUTIONS and the European monitoring network NORMAN has analyzed these challenges, evaluated the state-of-the-art of the science and suggested possible solutions. We give 10 recommendations to improve monitoring and to strengthen comprehensive prioritization, to foster consistent assessment and to support solution-oriented management of surface waters. The integration of effect-based tools, the application of passive sampling for bioaccumulative chemicals and an integrated strategy for prioritization of contaminants, accounting for knowledge gaps, are seen as important approaches to advance monitoring. Including all relevant chemical contaminants in more holistic "chemical status" assessment, using effect-based trigger values to address priority mixtures of chemicals, to better consider historical burdens accumulated in sediments and to use models to fill data gaps are recommended for a consistent assessment of contamination. Solution-oriented management should apply a tiered approach in investigative monitoring to identify toxicity drivers, strengthen consistent legislative frameworks and apply solutions-oriented approaches that explore risk reduction scenarios before and along with risk assessment.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical legislation; Effect-based tools; Passive sampling; Prioritization of contaminants; Solution-oriented management; Water Framework Directive review

Year:  2016        PMID: 27810758      PMCID: PMC8281610          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  92 in total

1.  CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data.

Authors:  Caroline T A Moermond; Robert Kase; Muris Korkaric; Marlene Ågerstrand
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Results of a "Whole Effluent Assessment" study from different industrial sectors in Germany according to OSPAR's WEA strategy.

Authors:  Stefan Gartiser; Christoph Hafner; Sven Oeking; Albrecht Paschke
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2008-11-20

3.  Most oxidative stress response in water samples comes from unknown chemicals: the need for effect-based water quality trigger values.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Charlotte van Daele; Mriga Dutt; Janet Y M Tang; Rolf Altenburger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Definition and applications of a versatile chemical pollution footprint methodology.

Authors:  Michiel C Zijp; Leo Posthuma; Dik van de Meent
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Advancing towards universal screening for organic pollutants in waters.

Authors:  Félix Hernández; María Ibáñez; Tania Portolés; María I Cervera; Juan V Sancho; Francisco J López
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Eco-epidemiology of aquatic ecosystems: Separating chemicals from multiple stressors.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Scott D Dyer; Dick de Zwart; Katherine Kapo; Christopher M Holmes; G Allen Burton
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Dependency of polychlorinated biphenyl and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon bioaccumulation in Mya arenaria on both water column and sediment bed chemical activities.

Authors:  Rainer Lohmann; Robert M Burgess; Mark G Cantwell; Steven A Ryba; John K MacFarlane; Philip M Gschwend
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  A large-scale model for simulating the fate & transport of organic contaminants in river basins.

Authors:  C Lindim; J van Gils; I T Cousins
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Towards science-based sediment quality standards-Effects of field-collected sediments in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Markus Brinkmann; Kathrin Eichbaum; Mathias Reininghaus; Sven Koglin; Ulrike Kammann; Lisa Baumann; Helmut Segner; Markus Zennegg; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Dioxin in the Elbe river basin: policy and science under the water framework directive 2000-2015 and toward 2021.

Authors:  Ulrich Förstner; Henner Hollert; Markus Brinkmann; Kathrin Eichbaum; Roland Weber; Wim Salomons
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.893

View more
  25 in total

1.  Assessing watercourse quality: challenges in implementing European and Swiss legal frameworks.

Authors:  Marianne Milano; Nathalie Chèvre; Emmanuel Reynard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Metabolome response to anthropogenic contamination on microalgae: a review.

Authors:  Léa Gauthier; Juliette Tison-Rosebery; Soizic Morin; Nicolas Mazzella
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Biomarkers as tools for monitoring within the Water Framework Directive context: concept, opinions and advancement of expertise.

Authors:  Thomas Milinkovitch; Olivier Geffard; Alain Geffard; Catherine Mouneyrac; Arnaud Chaumot; Benoit Xuereb; Cédric Fisson; Christophe Minier; Michel Auffret; Olivier Perceval; Emilie Egea; Wilfried Sanchez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Designing field-based investigations of organic micropollutant fate in rivers.

Authors:  Clarissa Glaser; Marc Schwientek; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Development, scrutiny, and modulation of transient reporter gene assays of the xenobiotic metabolism pathway in zebrafish hepatocytes.

Authors:  Sebastian Lungu-Mitea; Yuxin Han; Johan Lundqvist
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 6.  An International Perspective on the Tools and Concepts for Effluent Toxicity Assessments in the Context of Animal Alternatives: Reduction in Vertebrate Use.

Authors:  Teresa J Norberg-King; Michelle R Embry; Scott E Belanger; Thomas Braunbeck; Joshua D Butler; Phil B Dorn; Brianna Farr; Patrick D Guiney; Sarah A Hughes; Marlo Jeffries; Romain Journel; Marc Lèonard; Mark McMaster; James T Oris; Kathy Ryder; Helmut Segner; Thomas Senac; Glen Van Der Kraak; Graham Whale; Peter Wilson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Combining in vitro reporter gene bioassays with chemical analysis to assess changes in the water quality along the Ammer River, Southwestern Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian E Müller; Beate I Escher; Marc Schwientek; Martina Werneburg; Christiane Zarfl; Christian Zwiener
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.893

8.  Passive sampling and benchmarking to rank HOC levels in the aquatic environment.

Authors:  Ian John Allan; Branislav Vrana; Jasperien de Weert; Alfhild Kringstad; Anders Ruus; Guttorm Christensen; Petr Terentjev; Norman Whitaker Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Microwave Sensors for In Situ Monitoring of Trace Metals in Polluted Water.

Authors:  Ilaria Frau; Stephen Wylie; Patrick Byrne; Patrizia Onnis; Jeff Cullen; Alex Mason; Olga Korostynska
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Harvesting the promise of AOPs: An assessment and recommendations.

Authors:  Annamaria Carusi; Mark R Davies; Giovanni De Grandis; Beate I Escher; Geoff Hodges; Kenneth M Y Leung; Maurice Whelan; Catherine Willett; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.