Literature DB >> 30359486

An International Perspective on the Tools and Concepts for Effluent Toxicity Assessments in the Context of Animal Alternatives: Reduction in Vertebrate Use.

Teresa J Norberg-King1, Michelle R Embry2, Scott E Belanger3, Thomas Braunbeck4, Joshua D Butler5, Phil B Dorn6, Brianna Farr2, Patrick D Guiney7, Sarah A Hughes8, Marlo Jeffries9, Romain Journel10, Marc Lèonard11, Mark McMaster12, James T Oris13, Kathy Ryder14, Helmut Segner15, Thomas Senac10, Glen Van Der Kraak16, Graham Whale17, Peter Wilson18.   

Abstract

Since the 1940s, effluent toxicity testing has been used to assess potential ecological impacts of effluents and help determine necessary treatment options for environmental protection prior to release. Strategic combinations of toxicity tests, analytical tools, and biological monitoring have been developed. Because the number of vertebrates utilized in effluent testing is thought to be much greater than that used for individual chemical testing, there is a new need to develop strategies to reduce the numbers of vertebrates (i.e., fish) used. This need will become more critical as developing nations begin to use vertebrates in toxicity tests to assess effluent quality. A workshop was held to 1) assess the state of science in effluent toxicity testing globally; 2) determine current practices of regulators, industry, private laboratories, and academia; and 3) explore alternatives to vertebrate (fish) testing options and the inclusion of modified/new methods and approaches in the regulatory environment. No single approach was identified, because of a range of factors including regulatory concerns, validity criteria, and wider acceptability of alternatives. However, a suite of strategies in a weight-of-evidence approach would provide the flexibility to meet the needs of the environment, regulators, and the regulated community; and this "toolbox" approach would also support reduced reliance on in vivo fish tests. The present Focus article provides a brief overview of wastewater regulation and effluent testing approaches. Alternative methodologies under development and some of the limitations and barriers to regulatory approaches that can be selected to suit individual country and regional requirements are described and discussed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2745-2757.
© 2018 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC. © 2018 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal alternatives; Effluent testing; Regulation; Toxicity testing; Wastewater; Weight of evidence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30359486      PMCID: PMC6534126          DOI: 10.1002/etc.4259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  22 in total

1.  International trends in bioassay use for effluent management.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Power; Ruth S Boumphrey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Regulatory aspects on the use of fish embryos in environmental toxicology.

Authors:  Marlies Halder; Marc Léonard; Taisen Iguchi; James T Oris; Kathy Ryder; Scott E Belanger; Thomas A Braunbeck; Michelle R Embry; Graham Whale; Teresa Norberg-King; Adam Lillicrap
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  The use of fish cells in ecotoxicology. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 47.

Authors:  Argelia Castaño; Niels Bols; Thomas Braunbeck; Paul Dierickx; Marlies Halder; Boris Isomaa; Kazumi Kawahara; Lucy E J Lee; Carmel Mothersill; Peter Pärt; Guillermo Repetto; Juan Riego Sintes; Hans Rufli; Richard Smith; Chris Wood; Helmut Segner
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 4.  Review of evidence: are endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the aquatic environment impacting fish populations?

Authors:  Lesley J Mills; Clinton Chichester
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Requirements and test methods for on site domestic wastewater treatment plants: the European standard (prEN 12566-3) compared to other international standards.

Authors:  S Nonet
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.915

Review 6.  The fish embryo toxicity test as an animal alternative method in hazard and risk assessment and scientific research.

Authors:  Michelle R Embry; Scott E Belanger; Thomas A Braunbeck; Malyka Galay-Burgos; Marlies Halder; David E Hinton; Marc A Léonard; Adam Lillicrap; Teresa Norberg-King; Graham Whale
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Towards an alternative for the acute fish LC(50) test in chemical assessment: the fish embryo toxicity test goes multi-species -- an update.

Authors:  Thomas Braunbeck; Melanie Boettcher; Henner Hollert; Thomas Kosmehl; Eva Lammer; Erik Leist; Mark Rudolf; Nadja Seitz
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 8.  Proposal to improve vertebrate cell cultures to establish them as substitutes for the regulatory testing of chemicals and effluents using fish.

Authors:  Kristin Schirmer
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  Assessing the aquatic toxicity of complex hydrocarbon mixtures using solid phase microextraction.

Authors:  T F Parkerton; M A Stone; D J Letinski
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 10.  Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treatment works.

Authors:  A C Johnson; J P Sumpter
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  5 in total

1.  Considering Fish as Recipients of Ecosystem Services Provides a Framework to Formally Link Baseline, Development, and Post-operational Monitoring Programs and Improve Aquatic Impact Assessments for Large Scale Developments.

Authors:  Carolyn J M Brown; R Allen Curry; Michelle A Gray; Jennifer Lento; Deborah L MacLatchy; Wendy A Monk; Scott A Pavey; André St-Hilaire; Bernhard Wegscheider; Kelly R Munkittrick
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.644

Review 2.  Assessing Fish Immunotoxicity by Means of In Vitro Assays: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Helmut Segner; Kristina Rehberger; Christyn Bailey; Jun Bo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Interlaboratory Comparison of a Biomimetic Extraction Method Applied to Oil Sands Process-Affected Waters.

Authors:  Daniel J Letinski; Asfaw Bekele; Martin J Connelly
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 4.218

4.  Human and Aquatic Toxicity Potential of Petroleum Biodegradation Metabolite Mixtures in Groundwater from Fuel Release Sites.

Authors:  Timothy J Patterson; Lauren Kristofco; Asheesh K Tiwary; Renae I Magaw; Dawn A Zemo; Kirk T O'Reilly; Rachel E Mohler; Sungwoo Ahn; Natasha Sihota; Catalina Espino Devine
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  Cytochrome P450-dependent biotransformation capacities in embryonic, juvenile and adult stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio)-a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Loerracher; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 5.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.