Literature DB >> 23432033

Most oxidative stress response in water samples comes from unknown chemicals: the need for effect-based water quality trigger values.

Beate I Escher1, Charlotte van Daele, Mriga Dutt, Janet Y M Tang, Rolf Altenburger.   

Abstract

The induction of adaptive stress response pathways is an early and sensitive indicator of the presence of chemical and non-chemical stressors in cells. An important stress response is the Nrf-2 mediated oxidative stress response pathway where electrophilic chemicals or chemicals that cause the formation of reactive oxygen species initiate the production of antioxidants and metabolic detoxification enzymes. The AREc32 cell line is sensitive to chemicals inducing oxidative stress and has been previously applied for water quality monitoring of organic micropollutants and disinfection byproducts. Here we propose an algorithm for the derivation of effect-based water quality trigger values for this end point that is based on the combined effects of mixtures of regulated chemicals. Mixture experiments agreed with predictions by the mixture toxicity concept of concentration addition. The responses in the AREc32 and the concentrations of 269 individual chemicals were quantified in nine environmental samples, ranging from treated effluent, recycled water, stormwater to drinking water. The effects of the detected chemicals could explain less than 0.1% of the observed induction of the oxidative stress response in the sample, affirming the need to use effect-based trigger values that account for all chemicals present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23432033     DOI: 10.1021/es304793h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  20 in total

1.  An integrated approach for identifying priority contaminant in the Great Lakes Basin - Investigations in the Lower Green Bay/Fox River and Milwaukee Estuary areas of concern.

Authors:  Shibin Li; Daniel L Villeneuve; Jason P Berninger; Brett R Blackwell; Jenna E Cavallin; Megan N Hughes; Kathleen M Jensen; Zachary Jorgenson; Michael D Kahl; Anthony L Schroeder; Kyle E Stevens; Linnea M Thomas; Matthew A Weberg; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Rapid in situ toxicity testing with luminescent bacteria Photorhabdus luminescens and Vibrio fischeri adapted to a small portable luminometer.

Authors:  Petr Masner; Barbora Javůrková; Luděk Bláha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Effects of multi-component mixtures of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metal/loid(s) on Nrf2-antioxidant response element (ARE) pathway in ARE reporter-HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Sasikumar Muthusamy; Cheng Peng; Jack C Ng
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Human cell toxicogenomic analysis linking reactive oxygen species to the toxicity of monohaloacetic acid drinking water disinfection byproducts.

Authors:  Justin Pals; Matias S Attene-Ramos; Menghang Xia; Elizabeth D Wagner; Michael J Plewa
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Evaluation of targeted and untargeted effects-based monitoring tools to assess impacts of contaminants of emerging concern on fish in the South Platte River, CO.

Authors:  Drew R Ekman; Kristen Keteles; Jon Beihoffer; Jenna E Cavallin; Kenneth Dahlin; John M Davis; Aaron Jastrow; James M Lazorchak; Marc A Mills; Mark Murphy; David Nguyen; Alan M Vajda; Daniel L Villeneuve; Dana L Winkelman; Timothy W Collette
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Assessing the role of different dissolved organic carbon and bromide concentrations for disinfection by-product formation using chemical analysis and bioanalysis.

Authors:  Peta A Neale; Frederic D L Leusch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Embryo/larval toxicity and transcriptional effects in zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to endocrine active riverbed sediments.

Authors:  Luigi Viganò; Nadia Casatta; Anna Farkas; Giuseppe Mascolo; Claudio Roscioli; Fabrizio Stefani; Matteo Vitelli; Fabio Olivo; Laura Clerici; Pasquale Robles; Pierluisa Dellavedova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.