Literature DB >> 27519323

Eco-epidemiology of aquatic ecosystems: Separating chemicals from multiple stressors.

Leo Posthuma1, Scott D Dyer2, Dick de Zwart3, Katherine Kapo4, Christopher M Holmes4, G Allen Burton5.   

Abstract

A non-toxic environment and a good ecological status are policy goals guiding research and management of chemicals and surface water systems in Europe and elsewhere. Research and policies on chemicals and water are however still disparate and unable to evaluate the relative ecological impacts of chemical mixtures and other stressors. This paper defines and explores the use of eco-epidemiological analysis of surveillance monitoring data sets via a proxy to quantify mixture impacts on ecosystems. Case studies show examples of different, progressive steps that are possible. Case study data were obtained for various regions in Europe and the United States. Data types relate to potential stressors at various scales, concerning landscape, land-use, in-stream physico-chemical and pollutant data, and data on fish and invertebrates. The proxy-values for mixture impacts were quantified as predicted (multi-substance) Potentially Affected Fractions of species (msPAF), using Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) models in conjunction with bioavailability and mixture models. The case studies summarize the monitoring data sets and the subsequent diagnostic bioassessments. Variation in mixture toxic pressures amongst sites appeared to covary with abundance changes in large (50-86%) percentages of taxa for the various study regions. This shows that an increased mixture toxic pressure (msPAF) relates to increased ecological impacts. Subsequent multi-stressor evaluations resulted in statistically significant, site-specific diagnosis of the magnitudes of ecological impacts and the relative contributions of different stress factors to those impacts. This included both mixtures and individual chemicals. These results allow for ranking stressors, sites and impacted species groups. That is relevant information for water management. The case studies are discussed in relation to policy and management strategies that support reaching a non-toxic environment and good ecological status. Reaching these goals requires not only focused sectoral policies, such as on chemical- or water management, but also an overarching and solution-focused view. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological impact; Good ecological status; Multiple stress; Non-toxic environment; Species sensitivity distribution; Stressor ranking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27519323     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Alistair B A Boxall; Lorraine Maltby; Bryan W Brooks; Murray A Rudd; Thomas Backhaus; David Spurgeon; Violaine Verougstraete; Charmaine Ajao; Gerald T Ankley; Sabine E Apitz; Kathryn Arnold; Tomas Brodin; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jennifer Chapman; Jone Corrales; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Teresa F Fernandes; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gemma Giménez Papiol; Ksenia J Groh; Thomas H Hutchinson; Hank Kruger; Jussi V K Kukkonen; Stefania Loutseti; Stuart Marshall; Derek Muir; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Kai B Paul; Andreu Rico; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jörg Römbke; Tomas Rydberg; Helmut Segner; Mathijs Smit; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Marco Vighi; Inge Werner; Elke I Zimmer; Joke van Wensem
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.

Authors:  Scott Belanger; Mace Barron; Peter Craig; Scott Dyer; Malyka Galay-Burgos; Mick Hamer; Stuart Marshall; Leo Posthuma; Sandy Raimondo; Paul Whitehouse
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  An expanded conceptual framework for solution-focused management of chemical pollution in European waters.

Authors:  John Munthe; Eva Brorström-Lundén; Magnus Rahmberg; Leo Posthuma; Rolf Altenburger; Werner Brack; Dirk Bunke; Guy Engelen; Bernd Manfred Gawlik; Jos van Gils; David López Herráez; Tomas Rydberg; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Annemarie van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 5.893

5.  Prospective mixture risk assessment and management prioritizations for river catchments with diverse land uses.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Colin D Brown; Dick de Zwart; Jerome Diamond; Scott D Dyer; Christopher M Holmes; Stuart Marshall; G Allen Burton
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  What Works? the Influence of Changing Wastewater Treatment Type, Including Tertiary Granular Activated Charcoal, on Downstream Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity Over Time.

Authors:  Andrew C Johnson; Monika D Jürgens; François K Edwards; Peter M Scarlett; Helen M Vincent; Peter von der Ohe
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals.

Authors:  Carys L Mitchelmore; Emily E Burns; Annaleise Conway; Andrew Heyes; Iain A Davies
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 8.  Exposure modelling in Europe: how to pave the road for the future as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020-2030.

Authors:  Urs Schlüter; Jessica Meyer; Andreas Ahrens; Francesca Borghi; Frédéric Clerc; Christiaan Delmaar; Antonio Di Guardo; Tatsiana Dudzina; Peter Fantke; Wouter Fransman; Stefan Hahn; Henri Heussen; Christian Jung; Joonas Koivisto; Dorothea Koppisch; Alicia Paini; Nenad Savic; Andrea Spinazzè; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Natalie von Goetz
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.371

9.  Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and Belief.

Authors:  Albert A Koelmans; Ellen Besseling; Edwin Foekema; Merel Kooi; Svenja Mintenig; Bernadette C Ossendorp; Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm; Anja Verschoor; Annemarie P van Wezel; Marten Scheffer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 9.028

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.