Literature DB >> 25111657

Definition and applications of a versatile chemical pollution footprint methodology.

Michiel C Zijp1, Leo Posthuma, Dik van de Meent.   

Abstract

Because of the great variety in behavior and modes of action of chemicals, impact assessment of multiple substances is complex, as is the communication of its results. Given calls for cumulative impact assessments, we developed a methodology that is aimed at expressing the expected cumulative impacts of mixtures of chemicals on aquatic ecosystems for a region and subsequently allows to present these results as a chemical pollution footprint, in short: a chemical footprint. Setting and using a boundary for chemical pollution is part of the methodology. Two case studies were executed to test and illustrate the methodology. The first case illustrates that the production and use of organic substances in Europe, judged with the European water volume, stays within the currently set policy boundaries for chemical pollution. The second case shows that the use of pesticides in Northwestern Europe, judged with the regional water volume, has exceeded the set boundaries, while showing a declining trend over time. The impact of mixtures of substances in the environment could be expressed as a chemical footprint, and the relative contribution of substances to that footprint could be evaluated. These features are a novel type of information to support risk management, by helping prioritization of management among chemicals and environmental compartments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25111657     DOI: 10.1021/es500629f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Achieving Healthy and Sustainable Diets: A Review of the Results of Recent Mathematical Optimization Studies.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Christine L Cleghorn; Linda J Cobiac; Anja Mizdrak; Nhung Nghiem
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Identification and ranking of environmental threats with ecosystem vulnerability distributions.

Authors:  Michiel C Zijp; Mark A J Huijbregts; Aafke M Schipper; Christian Mulder; Leo Posthuma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  An expanded conceptual framework for solution-focused management of chemical pollution in European waters.

Authors:  John Munthe; Eva Brorström-Lundén; Magnus Rahmberg; Leo Posthuma; Rolf Altenburger; Werner Brack; Dirk Bunke; Guy Engelen; Bernd Manfred Gawlik; Jos van Gils; David López Herráez; Tomas Rydberg; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Annemarie van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 5.893

5.  Prospective mixture risk assessment and management prioritizations for river catchments with diverse land uses.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Colin D Brown; Dick de Zwart; Jerome Diamond; Scott D Dyer; Christopher M Holmes; Stuart Marshall; G Allen Burton
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 6.  Environmental footprint family to address local to planetary sustainability and deliver on the SDGs.

Authors:  Davy Vanham; Adrian Leip; Alessandro Galli; Thomas Kastner; Martin Bruckner; Aimable Uwizeye; Kimo van Dijk; Ertug Ercin; Carole Dalin; Miguel Brandão; Simone Bastianoni; Kai Fang; Allison Leach; Ashok Chapagain; Marijn Van der Velde; Serenella Sala; Rana Pant; Lucia Mancini; Fabio Monforti-Ferrario; Gema Carmona-Garcia; Alexandra Marques; Franz Weiss; Arjen Y Hoekstra
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Jos van Gils; Michiel C Zijp; Dik van de Meent; Dick de Zwart
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 8.  Toward Assessing Absolute Environmental Sustainability of Chemical Pollution.

Authors:  Marissa B Kosnik; Michael Zwicky Hauschild; Peter Fantke
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 11.357

9.  Towards a holistic and solution-oriented monitoring of chemical status of European water bodies: how to support the EU strategy for a non-toxic environment?

Authors:  Werner Brack; Beate I Escher; Erik Müller; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen; Tobias Schulze; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  Advances, Norms, and Perspectives in Product Chemical Footprint Research.

Authors:  Yi Li; Yiman Cheng; Luyao Zhou; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.