Literature DB >> 31586314

Biomarkers as tools for monitoring within the Water Framework Directive context: concept, opinions and advancement of expertise.

Thomas Milinkovitch1, Olivier Geffard2, Alain Geffard3, Catherine Mouneyrac4, Arnaud Chaumot2, Benoit Xuereb5, Cédric Fisson6, Christophe Minier5, Michel Auffret7, Olivier Perceval8, Emilie Egea9, Wilfried Sanchez9.   

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) currently supports chemical and ecological monitoring programmes in order to achieve the good water surface status. Although chemical and ecological assessments are necessary, they have some limitations. Chemical approaches focus on certain substances identified as priorities, but they do not take into account other potentially harmful substances and also ignore the hazards related to contaminant cocktails. On the other hand, while ecological approaches provide holistic information on the impairment of biological communities in ecosystems, they do not distinguish the role of contaminants in these alterations, and consequently do not allow the establishment of contaminant impact reduction plans. Consequently, ecotoxicologists suggest the use of effect-based tools such as biomarkers. Biomarkers highlight the effect of potentially harmful substances (or a cocktail), and their specificity towards the chemicals makes it possible to properly discriminate the role of toxicants within biological community impairments. Thus, the integration of such tools (besides existing chemical and ecological tools) in the WFD could considerably improve its biomonitoring strategy. The B n' B project (Biomarkers and Biodiversity) exposes key objectives that will allow to (i) establish an inventory of the biomarkers developed by French laboratories; (ii) determine their methodological advancement and limits and, on this basis, formulate recommendations for biomonitoring use and future research needs; (iii) discuss the biomarkers' ecological significance, specificity to contaminants and interpretation capacity; (iv) establish, in fine, a selection of valuable biomarkers to enter the WFD; and (iv) propose integrative tools to facilitate the decision-taking by stakeholders.

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Biomonitoring strategy; Contaminants; Ecotoxicology; Water Framework Directive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31586314     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06434-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

Review 1.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Environmental risk assessment of combined effects in aquatic ecotoxicology: a discussion paper.

Authors:  Jonny Beyer; Karina Petersen; You Song; Anders Ruus; Merete Grung; Torgeir Bakke; Knut Erik Tollefsen
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.130

3.  Linking feeding inhibition with reproductive impairment in Gammarus confirms the ecological relevance of feeding assays in environmental monitoring.

Authors:  Romain Coulaud; Olivier Geffard; Amandine Vigneron; Hervé Quéau; Adeline François; Arnaud Chaumot
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Relationship between DNA damage in sperm after ex vivo exposure and abnormal embryo development in the progeny of the three-spined stickleback.

Authors:  R Santos; M Palos-Ladeiro; A Besnard; J M Porcher; S Bony; W Sanchez; A Devaux
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Linking genotoxic responses in Gammarus fossarum germ cells with reproduction impairment, using the Comet assay.

Authors:  Emilie Lacaze; Olivier Geffard; Delphine Goyet; Sylvie Bony; Alain Devaux
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Modulation of ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase and glutathione S-transferase activities in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons containing two to four rings: implications in biomonitoring aquatic pollution.

Authors:  Asoka Pathiratne; Chamini K Hemachandra
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Environmental quality assessment in estuarine ecosystems: use of biometric measurements and fecundity of the ragworm Nereis diversicolor (Polychaeta, Nereididae).

Authors:  Cyril Durou; Catherine Mouneyrac; Claude Amiard-Triquet
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  PAH biomarker responses in polar cod (Boreogadus saida) exposed to benzo(a)pyrene.

Authors:  Jasmine Nahrgang; Lionel Camus; Patrice Gonzalez; Anders Goksøyr; Jørgen S Christiansen; Haakon Hop
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Combined and interactive effects of global climate change and toxicants on populations and communities.

Authors:  S Jannicke Moe; Karel De Schamphelaere; William H Clements; Mary T Sorensen; Paul J Van den Brink; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Immunological Responses of Marine Bivalves to Contaminant Exposure: Contribution of the -Omics Approach.

Authors:  Teresa Balbi; Manon Auguste; Caterina Ciacci; Laura Canesi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 7.561

2.  Integration of Genotoxic Biomarkers in Environmental Biomonitoring Analysis Using a Multi-Biomarker Approach in Three-Spined Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus Linnaeus, 1758).

Authors:  Amélie Cant; Marc Bonnard; Jean-Marc Porcher; Jean Prygiel; Audrey Catteau; Laurence Delahaut; Olivier Palluel; Cyril Turiès; Alain Geffard; Anne Bado-Nilles
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-02-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.