Literature DB >> 30499097

Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.

Angela M AuBuchon1, Corey I McGill2, Emily M Elliott2.   

Abstract

As children mature, their ability to remember information improves. This improvement has been linked to changes in verbal control processes such as rehearsal. Rehearsal processes are thought to undergo a quantitative shift around 7 years of age; however, direct measurement of rehearsal is difficult. We investigated a measure of rehearsal ability in children and compared this measurement to serial recall performance in the presence of auditory distractors. Theories of auditory distraction effects in children rely upon a combination of attentionally based and serial-order-based processes (Elliott et al. in Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 39-50, 2016); the present work contributes to the understanding of auditory distraction effects by measuring both types of processes within one study. Children completed an individually adjusted serial-recall task with auditory distractors. To assess rehearsal, each child's proportionalized articulatory difference (PAD) score was calculated from performance on adaptive digit span tasks performed in quiet and under articulatory suppression (see also Jarrold & Citroën in Developmental Psychology, 49, 837-847, 2013). Attentional processes were measured in two ways: first, by using complex span tasks, and second, by children's vulnerability to disruption in the context of irrelevant sound. The results indicated that the rehearsal measure was significantly related to the auditory distraction effect, but this relation was isolated to the attentional-diversion component of the irrelevant-sound effect. The results provide preliminary evidence that children consume attentional resources during rehearsal. Moreover, irrelevant sound disrupts children's rehearsal not solely through automatic, obligatory conflict. Rather, irrelevant sound diverts children's attention, which prevents attentional resources from supporting rehearsal processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory distractions; Children; Rehearsal; Serial-order recall

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30499097      PMCID: PMC6520208          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0879-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

Review 1.  Auditory distraction and short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications.

Authors:  S P Banbury; W J Macken; S Tremblay; D M Jones
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.

Authors:  A R Conway; N Cowan; M F Bunting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

4.  Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott; Alicia M Briganti
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-03-28

5.  Speech, "inner speech," and the development of short-term memory: effects of picture labeling on recall.

Authors:  G J Hitch; M S Halliday; A M Schaafstal; T M Heffernan
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1991-04

6.  Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.

Authors:  D Jones; C Madden; C Miles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

7.  Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span.

Authors:  N Cowan; N L Wood; P K Wood; T A Keller; L D Nugent; C V Keller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-06

8.  Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Ulrike Körner; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

9.  Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Ulrike Körner; Axel Buchner
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-03-23

10.  Children's working-memory processes: a response-timing analysis.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; John N Towse; Zoë Hamilton; J Scott Saults; Emily M Elliott; Jebby F Lacey; Matthew V Moreno; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Decomposing the role of rehearsal in auditory distraction during serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2020-11-10

2.  Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.