PURPOSE: Previous studies of breast MR elastography (MRE) evaluated the technique at magnetic field strengths of 1.5 Tesla (T) with the breast in contact with the driver. The aim of this study is to evaluate breast stiffness measurements and their reproducibility using a soft sternal driver at 3T and compare the results with qualitative measures of breast density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two healthy volunteers each underwent two separate breast MRE scans in a 3T MRI. MRE vibrations were introduced into the breasts at 60 Hz using a soft sternal driver and axial slices were collected using a gradient echo MRE sequence. Mean stiffness measurements were calculated for each volunteer as well as a measure of reproducibility using concordance correlation between scans. Mean stiffness values for each volunteer were assessed and related to amounts of fibroglandular tissue (i.e., breast lobules, ducts, and fibrous connective tissue). RESULTS: The stiffness values were reproducible with a significant P-value < 0.0001 between two scans with concordance correlation of 0.87 and 0.91 for center slice and grouping all slices, respectively. Volunteers with dense breasts (i.e., higher grades of fibroglandular tissue) had mean stiffness values of 0.96 kPa (center slice) and 0.92 kPa (all slices) while those without dense breasts had mean stiffness values of 0.85 kPa (center slice) and 0.83 kPa (all slices) (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Breast MRE is a reproducible technique at 3T using a soft sternal driver. Dense breasts had significantly higher stiffness measurements compared with nondense breasts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1379-1384.
PURPOSE: Previous studies of breast MR elastography (MRE) evaluated the technique at magnetic field strengths of 1.5 Tesla (T) with the breast in contact with the driver. The aim of this study is to evaluate breast stiffness measurements and their reproducibility using a soft sternal driver at 3T and compare the results with qualitative measures of breast density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two healthy volunteers each underwent two separate breast MRE scans in a 3T MRI. MRE vibrations were introduced into the breasts at 60 Hz using a soft sternal driver and axial slices were collected using a gradient echo MRE sequence. Mean stiffness measurements were calculated for each volunteer as well as a measure of reproducibility using concordance correlation between scans. Mean stiffness values for each volunteer were assessed and related to amounts of fibroglandular tissue (i.e., breast lobules, ducts, and fibrous connective tissue). RESULTS: The stiffness values were reproducible with a significant P-value < 0.0001 between two scans with concordance correlation of 0.87 and 0.91 for center slice and grouping all slices, respectively. Volunteers with dense breasts (i.e., higher grades of fibroglandular tissue) had mean stiffness values of 0.96 kPa (center slice) and 0.92 kPa (all slices) while those without dense breasts had mean stiffness values of 0.85 kPa (center slice) and 0.83 kPa (all slices) (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Breast MRE is a reproducible technique at 3T using a soft sternal driver. Dense breasts had significantly higher stiffness measurements compared with nondense breasts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1379-1384.
Authors: Wendie A Berg; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Fritz K W Schäfer; William E Svensson; Regina J Hooley; Ralf Ohlinger; Ellen B Mendelson; Catherine Balu-Maestro; Martina Locatelli; Christophe Tourasse; Barbara C Cavanaugh; Valérie Juhan; A Thomas Stavros; Anne Tardivon; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Willem P T M Mali; Karel G M Moons; Petra H M Peeters Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-11-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ria Mazumder; Samuel Schroeder; Xiaokui Mo; Alan S Litsky; Bradley D Clymer; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Arunark Kolipaka; Shivani R Aggarwal; Kiaran P McGee; Nandan Anavekar; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Peter A Wassenaar; Chethanya N Eleswarpu; Samuel A Schroeder; Xiaokui Mo; Brian D Raterman; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Emily Rose Triolo; Oleksandr Khegai; Efe Ozkaya; Nicholas Rossi; Akbar Alipour; Lazar Fleysher; Priti Balchandani; Mehmet Kurt Journal: Curr Protoc Date: 2022-03
Authors: Bhavika K Patel; Kay Pepin; Kathy R Brandt; Gina L Mazza; Barbara A Pockaj; Jun Chen; Yuxiang Zhou; Donald W Northfelt; Karen Anderson; Juliana M Kling; Celine M Vachon; Kristin R Swanson; Mehdi Nikkhah; Richard Ehman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Christopher Ebersole; Rizwan Ahmad; Adam V Rich; Lee C Potter; Huiming Dong; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Wiebke Neumann; Andreas Bichert; Jonas Fleischhauer; Antonia Stern; Roxana Figuli; Manfred Wilhelm; Lothar R Schad; Frank G Zöllner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 3.240