Literature DB >> 22282182

Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

Wendie A Berg1, David O Cosgrove, Caroline J Doré, Fritz K W Schäfer, William E Svensson, Regina J Hooley, Ralf Ohlinger, Ellen B Mendelson, Catherine Balu-Maestro, Martina Locatelli, Christophe Tourasse, Barbara C Cavanaugh, Valérie Juhan, A Thomas Stavros, Anne Tardivon, Joel Gay, Jean-Pierre Henry, Claude Cohen-Bacrie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether adding shear-wave (SW) elastographic features could improve accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) assessment of breast masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2008 to September 2010, 958 women consented to repeat standard breast US supplemented by quantitative SW elastographic examination in this prospective multicenter institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol. B-mode Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) features and assessments were recorded. SW elastographic evaluation (mean, maximum, and minimum elasticity of stiffest portion of mass and surrounding tissue; lesion-to-fat elasticity ratio; ratio of SW elastographic-to-B-mode lesion diameter or area; SW elastographic lesion shape and homogeneity) was performed. Qualitative color SW elastographic stiffness was assessed independently. Nine hundred thirty-nine masses were analyzable; 102 BI-RADS category 2 masses were assumed to be benign; reference standard was available for 837 category 3 or higher lesions. Considering BI-RADS category 4a or higher as test positive for malignancy, effect of SW elastographic features on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity after reclassifying category 3 and 4a masses was determined.
RESULTS: Median participant age was 50 years; 289 of 939 (30.8%) masses were malignant (median mass size, 12 mm). B-mode BI-RADS AUC was 0.950; eight of 303 (2.6%) BI-RADS category 3 masses, 18 of 193 (9.3%) category 4a lesions, 41 of 97 (42%) category 4b lesions, 42 of 57 (74%) category 4c lesions, and 180 of 187 (96.3%) category 5 lesions were malignant. By using visual color stiffness to selectively upgrade category 3 and lack of stiffness to downgrade category 4a masses, specificity improved from 61.1% (397 of 650) to 78.5% (510 of 650) (P<.001); AUC increased to 0.962 (P=.005). Oval shape on SW elastographic images and quantitative maximum elasticity of 80 kPa (5.2 m/sec) or less improved specificity (69.4% [451 of 650] and 77.4% [503 of 650], P<.001 for both), without significant improvement in sensitivity or AUC.
CONCLUSION: Adding SW elastographic features to BI-RADS feature analysis improved specificity of breast US mass assessment without loss of sensitivity. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22282182     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  187 in total

1.  A novel two-dimensional quantitative shear wave elastography for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.

Authors:  Li Tang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Xiao-Wan Bo; Bo-Ji Liu; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Dan-Dan Li; Lin Fang; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Li; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Jun-Mei Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for benign and malignant breast lesions with different sizes.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Li-Xia Zhao; Guang Xu; Ming-Hua Yao; Ai-Hong Zhang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Rong Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

4.  Additional diagnostic value of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler US for evaluation of breast non-mass lesions detected at B-mode US.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Jung Hee Shin; Ga Ram Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions : Our experience with QelaXtoTM software.

Authors:  Karina Pesce; Fernando Binder; María José Chico; María Paz Swiecicki; Diana Herbas Galindo; Sergio Terrasa
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-06-11

6.  Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung; So Joong Kim; Hyerin Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning.

Authors:  Xuejun Qian; Jing Pei; Hui Zheng; Xinxin Xie; Lin Yan; Hao Zhang; Chunguang Han; Xiang Gao; Hanqi Zhang; Weiwei Zheng; Qiang Sun; Lu Lu; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography?

Authors:  S J Vinnicombe; P Whelehan; K Thomson; D McLean; C A Purdie; L B Jordan; S Hubbard; A J Evans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Tumor stiffness measured by quantitative and qualitative shear wave elastography of breast cancer.

Authors:  Eun Jee Song; Yu-Mee Sohn; Mirinae Seo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Shuo Zhang; Jing Li; Jianyi Li; Ye Kang; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.