Li Zhao1, Marta Vidorreta2,3, Salil Soman1, John A Detre2,3, David C Alsop1. 1. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To improve pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) robustness to off-resonance and pulsatile blood flow velocity. METHODS: Bloch equations were solved to evaluate the effect of labeling parameters in a pulsatile flow model for a range of off-resonance. Experimental confirmation was achieved in volunteers using linear phase increase between labeling pulses to approximate off-resonance errors. We first assessed the location of the labeling plane in four volunteers. Next, we explored a range of parameters-including balanced and unbalanced gradients-in five more volunteers at an optimal labeling plane location. RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that 1) high velocities are vulnerable to off-resonance, 2) unbalanced PCASL outperforms balanced PCASL, 3) increased B1 and low average gradient improve the labeling efficiency for high-velocity flow, and 4) a low ratio of selective to average gradient improves off-resonance robustness. A good agreement between theory and experiment was observed. CONCLUSION: The robustness of PCASL can be increased by selecting an unbalanced scheme with a low average gradient (0.5 mT/m), a low ratio (7×) of selective to average gradients, and the highest feasible B1 (1.8 μT). Placing the labeling plane above the carotid bifurcation and below the V3 segment, usually between the second and third vertebrae, yielded robust results. Magn Reson Med 78:1342-1351, 2017.
PURPOSE: To improve pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) robustness to off-resonance and pulsatile blood flow velocity. METHODS: Bloch equations were solved to evaluate the effect of labeling parameters in a pulsatile flow model for a range of off-resonance. Experimental confirmation was achieved in volunteers using linear phase increase between labeling pulses to approximate off-resonance errors. We first assessed the location of the labeling plane in four volunteers. Next, we explored a range of parameters-including balanced and unbalanced gradients-in five more volunteers at an optimal labeling plane location. RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that 1) high velocities are vulnerable to off-resonance, 2) unbalanced PCASL outperforms balanced PCASL, 3) increased B1 and low average gradient improve the labeling efficiency for high-velocity flow, and 4) a low ratio of selective to average gradient improves off-resonance robustness. A good agreement between theory and experiment was observed. CONCLUSION: The robustness of PCASL can be increased by selecting an unbalanced scheme with a low average gradient (0.5 mT/m), a low ratio (7×) of selective to average gradients, and the highest feasible B1 (1.8 μT). Placing the labeling plane above the carotid bifurcation and below the V3 segment, usually between the second and third vertebrae, yielded robust results. Magn Reson Med 78:1342-1351, 2017.
Authors: Eric C Wong; Matthew Cronin; Wen-Chau Wu; Ben Inglis; Lawrence R Frank; Thomas T Liu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sudipto Dolui; Ze Wang; Danny J J Wang; Raghav Mattay; Mack Finkel; Mark Elliott; Lisa Desiderio; Ben Inglis; Bryon Mueller; Randall B Stafford; Lenore J Launer; David R Jacobs; R Nick Bryan; John A Detre Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Sina Aslan; Feng Xu; Peiying L Wang; Jinsoo Uh; Uma S Yezhuvath; Matthias van Osch; Hanzhang Lu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Adam Bush; Yaqiong Chai; So Young Choi; Lena Vaclavu; Scott Holland; Aart Nederveen; Thomas Coates; John Wood Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Moss Y Zhao; Audrey P Fan; David Yen-Ting Chen; Magdalena J Sokolska; Jia Guo; Yosuke Ishii; David D Shin; Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Dawn Holley; Kim Halbert; Andrea Otte; Brittney Williams; Taghi Rostami; Jun-Hyung Park; Bin Shen; Greg Zaharchuk Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: James H Holmes; Mu-Lan Jen; Laura B Eisenmenger; Tilman Schubert; Patrick A Turski; Kevin M Johnson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-02-21 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Fabio Nery; Charlotte E Buchanan; Anita A Harteveld; Aghogho Odudu; Octavia Bane; Eleanor F Cox; Katja Derlin; H Michael Gach; Xavier Golay; Marcel Gutberlet; Christoffer Laustsen; Alexandra Ljimani; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Ivan Pedrosa; Pottumarthi V Prasad; Philip M Robson; Kanishka Sharma; Steven Sourbron; Manuel Taso; David L Thomas; Danny J J Wang; Jeff L Zhang; David C Alsop; Sean B Fain; Susan T Francis; María A Fernández-Seara Journal: MAGMA Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Esther A H Warnert; Rebecca M E Steketee; Meike W Vernooij; M Arfan Ikram; Mika Vogel; Juan-Antonio Hernandez Tamames; Gyula Kotek Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 4.668