Gaël Saïb1, Alan P Koretsky1, S Lalith Talagala2. 1. NINDS/LFMI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2. NINDS/NMRF, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The sensitivity of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) to off-resonance effects (ΔB0 ) is a major limitation at ultra-high field (≥7T). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of different PCASL ΔB0 compensation methods at 7T and measure the labeling efficiency with off-resonance correction. THEORY AND METHODS: Phase offset errors induced by ΔB0 at the feeding arteries can be compensated by adding an extra radiofrequency (RF) phase increment and transverse gradient blips into the PCASL RF pulse train. The effectiveness of an average field correction (AVGcor), a vessel-specific field-map-based correction (FMcor) and a vessel-specific prescan-based correction (PScor) were compared at 7T. After correction, the PCASL labeling efficiency was directly measured in feeding arteries downstream from the labeling location. RESULTS: The perfusion signal was more uniform throughout the brain after off-resonance correction. Whole-brain average perfusion signal increased by a factor of 2.4, 2.5, and 2.1, respectively, with AVGcor, FMcor and PScor compared to acquisitions without correction. With off-resonance correction, the maximum labeling efficiency was ~0.68 at mean B1 (B1mean ) of 0.70 µT when using a mean gradient (Gmean ) of 0.25 mT/m. CONCLUSION: Either a prescan or a field map can be used to correct for off-resonance effects and retrieve a good brain perfusion signal at 7T. Although the three methods performed well in this study, FMcor may be better suited for patient studies because it accounted for vessel-specific ΔB0 variations. Further improvements in image quality will be possible by optimizing the labeling efficiency with advanced hardware and software while satisfying specific absorption rate constraints. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PURPOSE: The sensitivity of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) to off-resonance effects (ΔB0 ) is a major limitation at ultra-high field (≥7T). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of different PCASL ΔB0 compensation methods at 7T and measure the labeling efficiency with off-resonance correction. THEORY AND METHODS: Phase offset errors induced by ΔB0 at the feeding arteries can be compensated by adding an extra radiofrequency (RF) phase increment and transverse gradient blips into the PCASL RF pulse train. The effectiveness of an average field correction (AVGcor), a vessel-specific field-map-based correction (FMcor) and a vessel-specific prescan-based correction (PScor) were compared at 7T. After correction, the PCASL labeling efficiency was directly measured in feeding arteries downstream from the labeling location. RESULTS: The perfusion signal was more uniform throughout the brain after off-resonance correction. Whole-brain average perfusion signal increased by a factor of 2.4, 2.5, and 2.1, respectively, with AVGcor, FMcor and PScor compared to acquisitions without correction. With off-resonance correction, the maximum labeling efficiency was ~0.68 at mean B1 (B1mean ) of 0.70 µT when using a mean gradient (Gmean ) of 0.25 mT/m. CONCLUSION: Either a prescan or a field map can be used to correct for off-resonance effects and retrieve a good brain perfusion signal at 7T. Although the three methods performed well in this study, FMcor may be better suited for patient studies because it accounted for vessel-specific ΔB0 variations. Further improvements in image quality will be possible by optimizing the labeling efficiency with advanced hardware and software while satisfying specific absorption rate constraints. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Authors: Lydiane Hirschler; Clément S Debacker; Jérôme Voiron; Sascha Köhler; Jan M Warnking; Emmanuel L Barbier Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: William D Rooney; Glyn Johnson; Xin Li; Eric R Cohen; Seong-Gi Kim; Kamil Ugurbil; Charles S Springer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christian R Meixner; Christian K Eisen; Sebastian Schmitter; Max Müller; Jürgen Herrler; Bernhard Hensel; Arnd Dörfler; Michael Uder; Armin M Nagel Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556